【BlockBeats】As the US presidential election approaches, Wall Street has been closely studying a series of economic remarks by Trump. From calls for interest rate cuts to proposals for credit card rate controls, the market generally interprets these measures as “strong signals to boost growth.” The consensus among investment institutions is: the government will fully stimulate the economy before the election. What does this mean for cyclical assets? The answer might be more complex than you think.
In simple terms, the policy goals of the Trump administration are twofold—keep the economy active and ensure that the cost of living for ordinary people doesn’t become too high. From this perspective, sectors like industrials, raw materials, and non-essential consumer goods are in the spotlight. Defensive stocks? That’s not the current focus.
What do investment banks think? Raymond James analysts believe that with strong monetary and fiscal stimulus expectations, it’s hard to imagine an economic recovery failing. UBS also pointed out that these policies are largely driven by election considerations; voters’ core concerns remain prices, housing costs, oil prices, and interest rates—all of which directly impact wallets.
Interestingly, Trump’s proposal to cap credit card interest rates initially scared bank stocks. But UBS research team isn’t too worried, believing that even if such policies are implemented, they are usually temporary and limited in scope, unlikely to cause long-term shocks to the entire financial sector. They even see the pullback in bank stocks as a buying opportunity. JPMorgan’s stance is similar, expecting that as inflation continues to slow, there is room for further stimulus in 2026, which would be positive for cyclical stocks.
However, there is a risk point worth noting. The S&P 500 index is now approaching the 7000-point psychological level. Historical experience suggests that before breaking through such important psychological thresholds, the market often undergoes a correction. BTIG analyzed the past five instances of crossing the 1000-point mark, four of which were accompanied by a phase of correction. So in the short term, policy uncertainties and earnings season may bring volatility.
But overall, most institutions remain optimistic about the performance of cyclical stocks. Will the expectation of growth and improving corporate profits make cyclical stocks the main players in this round of market? There is plenty of room for follow-up observation. Market sentiment may indeed fluctuate, but the fundamental support seems stronger.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 12h ago
Is this another smoke screen before the election? Cut interest rates, cut interest rates, cut interest rates. We've been playing this game for three years and it's still the same old story.
Can cyclical stocks turn around? Wait and see, trusting half of what Wall Street folks say is enough.
Defense stocks have been sidelined, which is interesting. Is the risk appetite really that high?
If raw materials and industrials pick up, it depends on how long policies can support it. Don’t end up wasting effort again.
The stimulus expectations are built in, but the actual implementation is another matter...
This round of operation feels just like last time—hot before the election, cold after. Cyclical stock traders need to be more careful.
Investment banks are optimistic, but ultimately, making money still depends on finding your own bottom line.
Basically, it’s about waiting for a bottom signal. Cyclical stocks offer big opportunities but also come with high risks. I’m still on the sidelines.
This logic is a bit far-fetched. How easy is it really to achieve an economic recovery?
I’ve seen through the policy tricks. The key is whether liquidity can truly be sufficient and in place.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancer
· 12h ago
Lower interest rates + stimulus = cyclical stocks take off? I saw through this logic a long time ago, haha.
Cyclical sectors are opportunities but also traps. Friends who are optimistic about industrial and raw materials, be careful when taking positions.
Investment banks' rhetoric is all about cutting the leeks; who they stimulate before the election is anyone's guess.
I'm really amused that defensive stocks have been sidelined; this is the true reflection of the market.
The interest rate cut expectations have been speculated for so long. What will happen if it actually happens? Consider reverse strategies.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 13h ago
ngl, these "stimulus signals" are just classic pre-election theater... watched this pattern play out too many times on-chain. transaction flows always spike right before the official narrative gets pushed, suspicious timing tbh
Reply0
HalfBuddhaMoney
· 13h ago
Cutting interest rates, stimulus, cyclical stocks... The nice way to say it is promoting growth; the harsh way is vote-buying economics. Let's see if it can hold until after the election.
There are indeed opportunities in raw materials, but don’t be fooled by Wall Street—they’re always spinning stories.
Do defensive stocks really need to cool off? I doubt it; black swans never follow the script.
When cyclical stocks rise, does that mean industrials will surge? The question is, when will liquidity start to recede, my friend?
Wait a minute, cutting rates + consumer stimulus—aren’t these just new ways of printing money? Is inflation coming again?
It all sounds great, but the market may have already priced in these benefits long ago.
Bombarding before the election, and what after? That’s the real issue.
Raymond James says the recovery won’t fail... but I can’t help feeling like they’re just cheering themselves on.
Wall Street interprets Trump's growth-promoting signals: Can cyclical stocks become the next main theme of the market?
【BlockBeats】As the US presidential election approaches, Wall Street has been closely studying a series of economic remarks by Trump. From calls for interest rate cuts to proposals for credit card rate controls, the market generally interprets these measures as “strong signals to boost growth.” The consensus among investment institutions is: the government will fully stimulate the economy before the election. What does this mean for cyclical assets? The answer might be more complex than you think.
In simple terms, the policy goals of the Trump administration are twofold—keep the economy active and ensure that the cost of living for ordinary people doesn’t become too high. From this perspective, sectors like industrials, raw materials, and non-essential consumer goods are in the spotlight. Defensive stocks? That’s not the current focus.
What do investment banks think? Raymond James analysts believe that with strong monetary and fiscal stimulus expectations, it’s hard to imagine an economic recovery failing. UBS also pointed out that these policies are largely driven by election considerations; voters’ core concerns remain prices, housing costs, oil prices, and interest rates—all of which directly impact wallets.
Interestingly, Trump’s proposal to cap credit card interest rates initially scared bank stocks. But UBS research team isn’t too worried, believing that even if such policies are implemented, they are usually temporary and limited in scope, unlikely to cause long-term shocks to the entire financial sector. They even see the pullback in bank stocks as a buying opportunity. JPMorgan’s stance is similar, expecting that as inflation continues to slow, there is room for further stimulus in 2026, which would be positive for cyclical stocks.
However, there is a risk point worth noting. The S&P 500 index is now approaching the 7000-point psychological level. Historical experience suggests that before breaking through such important psychological thresholds, the market often undergoes a correction. BTIG analyzed the past five instances of crossing the 1000-point mark, four of which were accompanied by a phase of correction. So in the short term, policy uncertainties and earnings season may bring volatility.
But overall, most institutions remain optimistic about the performance of cyclical stocks. Will the expectation of growth and improving corporate profits make cyclical stocks the main players in this round of market? There is plenty of room for follow-up observation. Market sentiment may indeed fluctuate, but the fundamental support seems stronger.