2026-01-13 13:01:38

#密码资产动态追踪 Recently observed an interesting market phenomenon. Projects endorsed by top influencers often spark a wave of enthusiasm, and the token price rises for a while. But if it's a project supported by another type of celebrity effect, the results are disappointing — they dig a hole for you, then disappear. 🥲

It seems that in this market, the quality of trust endorsements varies greatly. Some can drive real trading activity and ecosystem participation, while others are purely a front for pulling the wool over investors' eyes. No wonder experienced traders say: before choosing an option, first see who is backing it behind the scenes; sometimes it's more important than reading the white paper.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ImpermanentPhobia

· 3h ago

Another story of being exploited, no wonder my first reaction when looking at projects is to dig into the people behind them. Some big V shouts, and the coin skyrockets; a celebrity endorses, and it crashes. Why is the gap so huge? Whitepapers? That stuff is just fooling people; you still have to see who is really making money. This market is just ridiculous; information asymmetry is life and death. Honestly, now I’d rather buy from experienced traders than believe in any celebrity effect.

View OriginalReply0

Rugpull幸存者

· 01-13 13:30

Really, this wave is another round of cutting, whoever endorses gets exposed to risks, it's predictable. Is the endorsement quality so poor? It's just real money or pure bragging. Whitepapers are just waste paper; the key is who dares to really invest money. It's the same old story: first cut retail investors, then talk about the ecosystem. The same old trick.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedNotStirred

· 01-13 13:22

Another story of getting cut like a leek, choosing the wrong endorsement can really lead to losing everything Are the gap between big V and celebrities really that big? I feel like it's all just tricks White paper? I stopped paying attention to that long ago, it's more reliable to just look at wallet flow The traps are all pre-dug, just waiting for us to step in Contract code can explain the issue better than endorsements, but this idea might be too idealistic Projects that rely on fame to pump are basically a no-go, lessons learned the hard way Choosing a project is really about choosing probabilities; high-quality endorsements do slightly increase the chances

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 01-13 13:20

Reliable influencers and celebrity endorsers are worlds apart. I've learned this after falling into a few pits before. Endorsement is something that some people truly care about the ecosystem, while others just take a quick profit and leave. When choosing projects, it's definitely better to look at the people involved rather than those flashy marketing copy. That's why, when I evaluate projects now, I first check who is endorsing, and then consider other aspects. Projects backed by big V influencers may not always be profitable, but at least they have ongoing maintenance, which is much better than celebrity endorsements. Some of it is indeed just routines—pumping the market today and running away tomorrow, making it hard to tell who is genuinely working. Honestly, right now, the market relies on endorsements to distinguish projects; everything else is just noise.

View OriginalReply0

Blockblind

· 01-13 13:05

It's really about reading people and their reactions. Some big V influencers cause the currency prices to soar when they promote, while some celebrities' endorsements actually backfire with hidden smirks.

View OriginalReply0