Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Interesting! The "trademark battle" farce in the AI circle,
ended with OpenAI "picking up the scraps." 😈
OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot) was originally named after Anthropic's Claude model,
it was supposed to be a mutually beneficial opportunity—project teams leverage promotion, and Anthropic could also benefit from community feedback.
But Anthropic chose to pursue legal action,
which instead pushed founder Peter Steinberger into OpenAI's arms.
Anthropic's shortsightedness:
As a result, they not only failed to secure a partnership but also became a "negative example" criticized by the community.
The higher the "walls" between AI companies, the easier it is to stifle innovation.
The future norm in the AI industry: technical geniuses and projects are often mobile; whoever can provide better platforms and resources wins.
Anthropic may regret it, but in the fiercely competitive AI race, this "zero-sum game" mentality could backfire.