Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Court Rejected xAI's Claims Against OpenAI in Elon Musk's Company Case
The federal court sided with OpenAI in the lawsuit against xAI, dismissing claims of alleged illegal employee poaching and confidential information leaks. On February 24, 2026, Judge Rita F. Lin issued a ruling to dismiss the case, citing insufficient evidence to support the allegations. This decision was a significant victory for the ChatGPT developer in their ongoing confrontation with the company led by Elon Musk.
Court Decision: Lack of Evidence Against OpenAI
The panel reviewed all case materials and concluded that xAI did not present convincing evidence of illegal conduct by OpenAI. Although the plaintiff pointed to the departure of eight specialists who nearly simultaneously moved to a competing organization, the court noted the absence of documents proving that OpenAI representatives actively facilitated or coordinated these transfers.
The judge emphasized that individual incidents, such as keeping work correspondence on personal devices and refusing to provide confidentiality agreements, alone cannot serve as grounds to accuse the company as a whole. Such actions, according to the court, more likely indicate behavior of individual employees rather than a coordinated company strategy.
xAI Allegations: Code and Internal Information Leaks
During the proceedings, xAI claimed that two of the eight departing employees may have obtained the company’s source code. Additionally, the plaintiff alleged attempts to access internal databases after the specialists joined OpenAI. However, court documents did not contain direct evidence linking these alleged incidents to deliberate actions by the company itself.
xAI reserves the right to file an amended lawsuit with more specific claims and expanded evidence. At the time of the ruling, xAI representatives did not provide an official comment regarding the court’s decision.
Extended Context: Elon Musk’s Legal Battle Against OpenAI
This case is just one episode in a broader legal confrontation between Elon Musk and OpenAI’s leadership. Over recent years, the conflict has intensified and become public, attracting media attention and investor interest.
The most significant ongoing case concerns the transformation of OpenAI from a non-profit organization into a for-profit entity. A jury trial is scheduled for April 2026. OpenAI welcomed today’s court ruling, stating that the xAI lawsuit was unfounded and part of a wider pressure campaign initiated by Elon Musk.
Last year, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman publicly stated that Elon Musk is attempting to slow the company’s development and innovation efforts by using legal mechanisms as a tool of pressure. These mutual accusations highlight an escalating rift between the parties, unlikely to be resolved in the near future.