2025-12-10 13:29:35

Centralized exchanges need to address internal risk control issues.

Employees handle massive fund flows daily. Saying they are completely unaffected? That’s unrealistic. The problem is that many platforms’ risk control mechanisms are like paper—detect issues lightly and handle them casually, then switch to a different disguise in a few days and repeat. This approach, in the end, the ones who pay the price are always us ordinary players.

If top-tier exchanges are caught making such mistakes for the first time, their subsequent handling attitude directly determines whether trust can be rebuilt. Covering it up or just penalizing with a few drinks? That’s basically telling the market: there will be more next time.

Honestly, for the industry to develop long-term, internal governance must be serious. It’s not enough to just issue a notice and apologize; real tangible measures for rectification are needed. After all, in this circle, once trust is broken, it may never be rebuilt.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenSleuth

· 6h ago

Switching aliases to continue scamming, this routine is so old, how can anyone still believe it? It's just waiting for the right moment and then using the same old tricks, I've seen through it all long ago. What they call risk control is actually a paper tiger; a poke and it breaks. Once trust is lost, no matter how many announcements are made, it's useless. These so-called leading exchanges are fundamentally the same at their core. Internal personnel supervision is indeed riddled with loopholes; no one has really taken it seriously. Let's wait and see how they handle it next; this is the real test of whether they are serious or not.

View OriginalReply0

RegenRestorer

· 12-10 13:59

The old practice of forcing someone to drink three cups should have been eliminated long ago. If there's no correction, get out.

View OriginalReply0

SpeakWithHatOn

· 12-10 13:59

You're right, those big exchanges are constantly penalizing traders, and we retail investors still have to use their platforms. It's really ironic. Listen to me, it's better to diversify across multiple platforms rather than all-in on one, anyway their internal governance is like that. The key is I've never seen any exchange really go all out; it's all PR statements, and they keep playing their games. What do they think of our money? We just have to watch their整改 slowly, it's hilarious. The major exchanges that had issues before just went through it like that, and next time will be the same.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekConfession

· 12-10 13:57

This is outrageous. Every time it's just an announcement and an apology. Where is the real rectification? Changing masks and coming back again, no matter who it is, they'll be cursed. What sounds good is risk control, but frankly, it's just firewall wallpaper; once a hole is broken, it can't be patched. Trust is really fragile. One time is enough. It's the same old story: apology, compensation, rectification... they'll do it again next time. Isn't it annoying?

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 12-10 13:50

Switching to a new disguise to continue? Sure, but in the end, we're the retail investors who suffer the most, right?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 12-10 13:46

Coming back with a new alias? Laughing to death, I've never seen such perfunctory behavior. It was long overdue for someone to properly regulate these places; risk control is non-existent. Trust is something you say is gone, and it’s gone instantly—faster than anything else. Employees holding so much money, it's no wonder they get tempted. The key is that the platform doesn't want to investigate seriously at all. Just a slap on the wrist with three cups of punishment? Wake up, everyone, the next scheme is already in the works. If you really want to do long-term business, don't fool around like this, or you'll be taught a lesson by the market sooner or later. Issuing an apology announcement, what’s the use? I just want to see real rectification, visible improvements.

View OriginalReply0

SquidTeacher

· 12-10 13:38

That's right, risk control is just a facade; we're just the patsies cleaning up their mess. Switching aliases to continue? This trick has been played out; sooner or later, they'll crash. Trust is like paper—once punctured, it tears and can't be repaired. These days, the bottom line of exchanges and the moral bottom line of employees are equally low. Let's wait and see which platform dares to truly make reforms; otherwise, I would have already run away.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#FedRateCutPrediction
58.97K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
54.46K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
275.51K Popularity
#SUIETFLaunched
14.19K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
12.66K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
btcbtc
MC:$3.63KHolders:2
0.09%
2
SPXIDSPX EXPRESS LOGISCTIC
MC:$3.93KHolders:3
1.63%
3
yalayala
MC:$3.6KHolders:2
0.00%
4
KEKIUSKEKIUS MAXIMUS
MC:$3.58KHolders:2
0.00%
5
GGGold Gate
MC:$3.64KHolders:2
0.04%

Sitemap