2025-12-10 15:40:31

#美联储联邦公开市场委员会决议 Midnight FOMC decision just came out, it feels like $BTC is about to see a sharp surge— a run-up followed by a drop.

How the Federal Reserve executes this move will directly determine the subsequent rebound space. My judgment is to first probe the highs, then most likely encounter selling pressure. What do you all think about this market? Do you believe it will follow the rhythm I mentioned 🤔

Anyway, keep a close eye on the latest FOMC statements, that's the real indicator.

BTC-0.01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PoolJumper

· 11h ago

Buy first, then sell off; this tactic is getting old. The Federal Reserve is once again trying to see the dust settle.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 23h ago

First rush in, then break it down—I’ve seen this trick too many times. Can the FOMC really set a ceiling this time? It feels like every time they overpromise.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 12-10 16:02

It's the usual pattern of rising first and then falling; the Federal Reserve's move is really impressive.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinAnxiety

· 12-10 16:00

Haha, it's the same old trick to lure more investors Charging in first and then crashing down, I've seen it many times. Anyway, once the FOMC announcement comes out, it's a watershed moment God knows when the Federal Reserve will change its stance

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 12-10 15:57

First charge then crash, I've seen this routine many times. How should the Federal Reserve phrase this move to be the most effective?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHermit

· 12-10 15:56

Watching the FOMC overnight just keeps me from sleeping. The pattern of rising first and then falling always plays out every time.

View OriginalReply0