2025-12-11 00:36:36

Industry exec Phong Le made waves on financial TV recently, laying out why the $60 trillion digital credit space matters now. His take on MSCI's stance? Blocking passive funds from bitcoin exposure today mirrors past mistakes—imagine banning oil investments in the 1900s, telecom spectrum plays in the '80s, or cloud infrastructure bets when the internet took off. Each era had its breakthrough asset class. Is crypto next in line?

BTC2.48%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RamenDeFiSurvivor

· 15h ago

ngl Phong Le's analogy is brilliant; history always repeats itself. The MSCI folks are really repeating past mistakes.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationOracle

· 12-11 01:06

ngl Phong Le is right, MSCI's recent moves are indeed a bit disappointing, history always repeats itself.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetScholar

· 12-11 01:04

Damn, MSCI this time is really a repeat of history. Every time, you have to wait to die before regretting.

View OriginalReply0

ILCollector

· 12-11 01:04

Haha, MSCI's move is really a replay of history, just like missing out on the internet wave back then.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxOpener

· 12-11 01:03

Wait, is MSCI really that conservative? Isn't this just a repeat of institutional investors missing out on the internet era back then? That's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0

DegenApeSurfer

· 12-11 01:01

Nah, this comparison is peak cope lmao, how can oil and cloud compare to BTC... But speaking of MSCI, this wave does seem a bit like guarding the vault and watching the poor.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekNewSickle

· 12-11 00:43

Laughing out loud, it's the same old "history will repeat itself" argument—who hasn't heard this phrase before? --- If MSCI really were that lousy, they would have been eliminated by the market long ago. They just don't want to take the blame. --- The claim of 60 trillion... where does the data come from? Isn't this just the project's favorite "future market size" argument? --- Oil, gas, telecommunications, cloud computing... all have them. Why is it this time that it's the turn of cryptocurrencies? The key is still cash flow, my friend. --- Passive funds might dare to enter the market—more leeks later. Is that a good thing? Hard to say. --- A typical "miss this bus and you'll never get on" marketing tactic. I'm already tired of hearing it. For your reference only.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 12-11 00:36

Bitcoin is just like missing out on oil and gas back in the day; MSCI's recent moves are indeed a bit conservative.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#GateNovTransparencyReportReleased
3.51K Popularity
#FedRateCutComing
636.74K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
54.33K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
12.84K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
540.26K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
🐒猴子
MC:$3.68KHolders:2
0.00%
2
WEB3WEB3
MC:$4.06KHolders:3
2.10%
3
道道
MC:$3.63KHolders:1
0.00%
4
ETCALTAR
MC:$3.58KHolders:1
0.00%
5
btcbtc
MC:$3.65KHolders:2
0.04%

Sitemap