🔥 Gate Square Event: #PostToWinNIGHT 🔥
Post anything related to NIGHT to join!
Market outlook, project thoughts, research takeaways, user experience — all count.
📅 Event Duration: Dec 10 08:00 - Dec 21 16:00 UTC
📌 How to Participate
1️⃣ Post on Gate Square (text, analysis, opinions, or image posts are all valid)
2️⃣ Add the hashtag #PostToWinNIGHT or #发帖赢代币NIGHT
🏆 Rewards (Total: 1,000 NIGHT)
🥇 Top 1: 200 NIGHT
🥈 Top 4: 100 NIGHT each
🥉 Top 10: 40 NIGHT each
📄 Notes
Content must be original (no plagiarism or repetitive spam)
Winners must complete Gate Square identity verification
Gat
Senator Mike Lee just dropped an interesting take on the data center debate that's heating up across the U.S. When pressed about whether these facilities are becoming political hot potatoes—especially with communities freaking out over power consumption and potential spikes in electricity costs—he didn't dodge the question.
His stance? Sure, the worries aren't baseless. People see massive server farms popping up and immediately think their bills are going through the roof. But here's his counterpoint: data centers aren't freeloading off the grid. They're covering their own energy costs, not passing the buck to everyday consumers.
This matters more than it seems on the surface. With crypto mining operations and blockchain infrastructure heavily reliant on these facilities, how lawmakers frame the conversation around energy use could shape regulatory approaches down the line. Lee's position suggests a more measured view—one that acknowledges concerns without villainizing the infrastructure that powers much of our digital economy, including the decentralized networks we're all building on.