$PIPPIN's recent trend has been quite unpredictable. A major account holds a position of 22 million USD, with floating losses now reaching 1.36 million USD. At the current cost basis, the price needs to be driven to around 2.9 to break even.
Interestingly, this major holder not only has spot holdings but also multiple backdoor positions, plus bots eating liquidity. Probabilistically, it's indeed less likely to be drained completely.
But here's the problem—obviously, the other side wants to do the same as before, relying on fee collection and time to gradually wear down the opponent. If they truly go head-to-head like this, how high are the chances of winning? During periods of repeated market fluctuations, who can really endure until the end? What do you all think about this tug-of-war between the main forces?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-26d7f434
· 12-12 14:46
Oh no, a floating loss of $13,600 on $22 million directly stunned me. How painful is that... It needs to rise to 2.9 to break even, feels pretty hopeless.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapy
· 12-12 14:44
2.9? Laughing to death, this big player will have to wait until the Year of the Monkey and the Horse
This confrontation depends on who breaks first emotionally, it's really hard to say
Rely on earning fees? Wake up, liquidity is so poor now, it's all about who has a stronger backbone
The game among the major players, we just watch the show, don't follow the trend and get caught
View OriginalReply0
MoonBoi42
· 12-12 14:43
A floating loss of 1.36 million dollars, and you still dare to go all-in? That mentality is incredible. But can 2.9 really push it up? It feels uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSeller
· 12-12 14:41
22 million floating loss 1.36 million, who can withstand this, I'm truly convinced
The ones who can last until the end are often those who don't care about time cost. Large traders holding more chips have a significant advantage, but it's really tough
In this tug-of-war, it ultimately comes down to whose funding chain is stronger. The small amount of transaction fees won't kill anyone
View OriginalReply0
ZenMiner
· 12-12 14:31
1.36 million floating loss, not worried at all. This brother really has confidence. I just want to see if 2.9 can hold.
$PIPPIN's recent trend has been quite unpredictable. A major account holds a position of 22 million USD, with floating losses now reaching 1.36 million USD. At the current cost basis, the price needs to be driven to around 2.9 to break even.
Interestingly, this major holder not only has spot holdings but also multiple backdoor positions, plus bots eating liquidity. Probabilistically, it's indeed less likely to be drained completely.
But here's the problem—obviously, the other side wants to do the same as before, relying on fee collection and time to gradually wear down the opponent. If they truly go head-to-head like this, how high are the chances of winning? During periods of repeated market fluctuations, who can really endure until the end? What do you all think about this tug-of-war between the main forces?