#美联储联邦公开市场委员会决议 When playing with cryptocurrencies, what should you truly be afraid of? It's not the sharp drops in K-line charts, but rather pouring real money into projects with no future. $SOL, $PEPE, $ZEC and other popular coins all have stories backing them, but what about more trash coins? What can they offer you?



Recently, there's an interesting project—building an IP using powerful cultural cores like courage, loyalty, and victory. This logic may not be new in the crypto world, but if executed well, it can ignite community enthusiasm. In simple terms, relying solely on technical indicators and whitepapers is outdated. What really attracts incremental users are projects that can tell stories and have a spiritual core.

Instead of blindly FOMO, think more: Is the cultural narrative of this project credible? How deep is the community consensus? This is much more reliable than looking at price fluctuations and data charts. Opportunities are right there; wasting time on garbage projects is the biggest cost.
SOL-0.14%
PEPE0.04%
ZEC1.98%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
VitalikFanAccountvip
· 12-16 01:02
Projects with strong storytelling abilities are indeed more popular, but this also gives scammers too much room to operate. That's right, instead of chasing after price swings, it's better to see if the community is sincere, but most people are still blinded by FOMO. The most frightening thing about trash coins isn't their decline, but that you have no idea what you're doing when you enter. Cultural narratives sound sophisticated, but how can you tell if it's genuine belief or carefully crafted marketing? Putting money into projects with no story is the fastest way to fail, but even those that tell good stories are not necessarily reliable.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaservip
· 12-15 16:34
It sounds like they're advising me not to chase trash coins, but to be honest, I'm already tired of the cultural narrative approach. Can a different story and a new shell really just cut a wave of leeks? Or should I just see if the team has real cash on hand?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecodervip
· 12-13 18:29
From a technical architecture perspective, the so-called "cultural core" is essentially a narrative layer of packaging. The true moat should be reflected in on-chain data metrics. The difference between junk coins and promising projects ultimately depends on code audit reports and on-chain activity data; you can't just rely on stories.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandSistervip
· 12-13 05:40
Cryptocurrencies are really terrible, there's always someone to buy the dip. Storytelling? I've seen too many "spiritual core" projects end up being nothing but hype. Community consensus? What’s that about? It’s just about sticking together for warmth. Cultural narratives credible? Nice words, but basically just marketing hype. Compared to these illusions, I still trust technology and team backgrounds. Poor projects are indeed the biggest cost, no doubt, but who can really avoid them? I regret getting involved with a few "IP-type" projects; now they’re all zeroed out. This article might be a bit motivational, but it hits the pain points of the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmervip
· 12-13 05:37
No matter how good the white paper sounds, it’s useless. The key is whether the community can hold on; that’s the true test of real value. --- The tricks of scam coins to fleece investors are always the same. No matter how beautiful the story or how strong the cultural core, if no one takes the bait, it’s all pointless. --- Instead of studying candlestick charts, it’s better to understand human psychology. Those who understand community consensus have long become wealthy. --- That’s right. Just playing with coins isn’t enough now. You need a narrative and spiritual connotations to really ignite the market. --- The scariest thing is going all-in on a project that’s just air, while watching others’ SOL multiply tenfold. --- Courage and loyalty lead to victory. This set is indeed easy to brainwash people, but few projects can truly deliver on their promises. --- Rather than blindly FOMO, ask yourself first: do I really believe in the story behind this coin? --- The most frightening thing about scam coins is that they make you feel like you’ve missed out on something. --- In the crypto world, the cultural IP approach is basically high-level money printing. It’s about who can tell a story that sounds more real. --- The opportunity is there, but most people just throw their money into a black hole.
View OriginalReply0
CoconutWaterBoyvip
· 12-13 05:30
Really, compared to the decline, I'm more afraid of my own blindness in choosing projects. Carelessly, I could lose thousands of dollars in a blink. Projects with strong storytelling skills are indeed more attractive, but you need to discern truth from falsehood, or else you'll be the next rug pull. The point about the credibility of cultural narratives is correct, but how to judge? High community activity does not equal a promising project. Rather than reading whitepapers, I'd prefer to dive directly into the community and listen to what seasoned players have to say. Shit coins are just shit coins. No matter how good the story, it can't hide the essence.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseurvip
· 12-13 05:29
That's right, scam coins rely on storytelling to fleece retail investors, but there are actually quite a few who believe... The core of the culture depends on who tells it; a sincere story and a deceptive one often look the same.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMiseryvip
· 12-13 05:25
Well said, garbage coins are indeed a poison. I've seen too many friends lose everything. The culture narrative is indeed a breakthrough point for differentiation, but 99% of projects are just talking nonsense. The key is whether the founding team really understands crypto and can withstand the bear market. Whitepapers are outdated; now it's all about social proof and community enthusiasm. A project without consensus, no matter how good the story, is just an illusion. Honestly, instead of chasing highs and lows, it's better to analyze what logical support is behind the price. People who are always driven by FOMO, nine out of ten will end up cutting losses at the bottom. The fastest way to assess a project is to see if its Discord is active—that's the real reflection. Before institutional entry, retail investors have already played out the story.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)