🎨 Gate AI Creation Contest | One Sentence, Draw Your 2026
On Gate Square, anyone can be a visual creator — truly zero barriers to entry.
With just one sentence, generate an image and bring your vision of 2026 to life.
Create and post your work using Gate Square AI Creation for a chance to win the Gate Year of the Horse New Year Gift Box.
📅 Duration
Dec 17, 2025, 10:00 – Jan 3, 2026, 18:00 UTC
🎯 How to Join
1. Go to Gate Square → Create Post → AI Creation
2. Enter one sentence to generate your image
3. Post with #GateAICreation
🏆 Rewards
5 winners: Gate Year of the Horse New Year
Are EU's Existing Crypto Safeguards Sufficient? Regulators Split on Stablecoin Controls
The European Union faces an emerging regulatory puzzle: while the European Banking Authority (EBA) maintains that current cryptocurrency regulations are sufficient to manage stablecoin risks, two heavyweight institutions are pushing back hard. The European Central Bank (ECB) and European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) have both sounded alarms about the financial stability threats posed by stablecoins, particularly those operating across multiple jurisdictions.
Where the Disagreement Lies
The core tension centers on operational models used by global stablecoin issuers. Companies issuing tokens like USDC and USDT employ what regulators call a “multi-location issuance” strategy—essentially running parallel token systems across the EU and other regions simultaneously. The EBA acknowledges these concerns, pointing specifically to the risk of sudden, large-scale redemption waves. However, the authority contends that the actual danger level hinges heavily on how individual stablecoin projects are structured and their market footprint.
The Systemic Risk Nobody Wants to See
The ESRB paints a darker picture. Their analysis highlights a scenario where non-EU investors simultaneously demand redemption of tokens originally issued within Europe. Such a coordinated withdrawal could drain liquidity at dangerous speed, potentially triggering a cascading financial crisis. More troubling: regulatory officials have flagged a geopolitical risk. If mass withdrawals occur, U.S. authorities might restrict dollar flows destined for European institutions, leaving stablecoin issuers unable to honor redemption obligations.
What Brussels Must Decide
Both the ECB and ESRB have formally called for Brussels to tighten the operational constraints on stablecoin companies—especially those embracing the multi-location model. The regulatory bodies argue that tougher guardrails are necessary rather than sufficient to prevent systemic contagion. Whether the EU will upgrade its framework beyond what the EBA considers adequate remains the critical question shaping the bloc’s crypto policy trajectory.