Long-time players in the crypto world and newcomers just entering the scene, the differences are quite obvious. It’s not about who is better at following trends, but who can survive longer when the big waves come.

History loves to play tricks on us. Remember five years ago? A prominent figure publicly criticized Bitcoin and the entire crypto ecosystem on social media, speaking quite bluntly—saying they "aren’t real money, prices jump around wildly, and there’s no real backing." Fast forward to 2025, this former crypto critic has indirectly held about $870 million worth of Bitcoin through his media and tech conglomerate. Ironic? No, this is market education.

What exactly happened? The media and tech group controlled by this big shot made a bold move in July this year, investing $2 billion in Bitcoin. Subsequently, Bitcoin’s price increased by about 6%, and through his 41% stake in the company, his personal Bitcoin holdings skyrocketed to $870 million. But that’s not the most interesting part.

The most intriguing aspect is his dramatic policy shift. After taking office, he completely overturned the previous government’s stance on digital assets, significantly relaxed the regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, and even began promoting the establishment of a "national Bitcoin strategic reserve." This isn’t just a change in attitude; it’s a dual shift in power and policy.

From skeptic to major player, how thorough is this transformation? In 2019, he explicitly expressed on Twitter his dislike for Bitcoin and other crypto assets—using the same old arguments many traditional finance folks still hold: high volatility, lack of fundamentals, not real money. Yet by 2025, he’s indirectly holding $870 million worth of Bitcoin through his controlled companies. The stark contrast from outright denial to holding massive positions in the actual asset itself is a market lesson in itself.

Why is this worth paying attention to? Because it reflects a deeper phenomenon—improving policy environments are shifting from verbal promises to real actions. When the highest authorities start accumulating Bitcoin and establishing strategic reserves, the fundamental landscape of the entire market has undergone a qualitative change. This not only influences institutional investors’ allocations but also adjusts retail investors’ psychological expectations.

The market is always seeking new consensus. And this time, the consensus is shifting from "cryptocurrencies are bubbles" to "Bitcoin is a strategic asset." Those who can understand this transition and position themselves early are the ones truly grasping the storm.