Does anyone still remember that old article on Zhihu? It’s said that many influential figures in the circle only went all-in on Bitcoin after reading it. It contained a bold prophecy — that by 2050, BTC would surge to $1 million. At the time, almost everyone thought it was a pipe dream.



Even more outrageous, the article vaguely mentioned that "in 26 years, a Chinese coin will skyrocket by tens of thousands of times." Looking back now, it still gives me a bit of a chill.

Prophecies are so addictive because, frankly, they provide a "reference point" in an uncertain market. But the question that follows is: once those old benchmarks become reality, where should we look next?

Many may not realize that we are already standing at a more tangible watershed than "Bitcoin hitting a million": the wave of asset tokenization.

This is not some mysticism or metaphysics, but a very pragmatic development — bringing real assets (government bonds, bonds, institutional credit, etc.) onto the blockchain, turning them into yield-generating collateral.

The old dilemma was this: your funds either chase high yields on-chain with unknown risks, or sit in traditional finance earning pitifully low interest, leaving two worlds completely disconnected.

Now, some projects aim to break down this wall. For example, tokenizing U.S. Treasury bonds and depositing them into protocols, instantly swapping out stablecoins to continue operating in the DeFi ecosystem, while retaining ownership of the original assets — effectively enjoying both the interest from government bonds and DeFi mining yields simultaneously.

Why is this approach so crucial?

Because the Bitcoin story has been told repeatedly, and the market is digesting this narrative. The next driver will inevitably be the theme of "efficiency." No longer driven solely by faith, but by real, tangible yields. That’s the real reason big funds are entering the space.
BTC-0.4%
DEFI2.18%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MeltdownSurvivalistvip
· 6h ago
It's the same old "prophecy theory" again. Those who believe have already gone all-in, and those who don't believe, what are you still waiting for?
View OriginalReply0
MrDecodervip
· 6h ago
Hmm... I really didn't expect the part about Chinese coins multiplying thousands of times. Looking back now, it's a bit terrifying. Wait, can asset tokenization really break down this wall? It still sounds quite idealistic. What was the keyword in that Zhihu article? I don't quite remember. Tokenization of government bonds combined with DeFi mining... that sounds like the next scam story. The prophecy of a million dollars is slowly becoming real; I can't hold back anymore. Is efficiency the next narrative? What about projects that were supported by faith before? Do we still have to keep gambling? It's really about seeing who can truly make RWA happen, not just talk about it. I don't trust you, every time you say big funds will enter, but in the end, it's still retail investors taking the hit.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObservervip
· 6h ago
Haha, I haven't read that article, but claiming a surge of tens of thousands of times in 26 years... You really dare to say that. This wave of RWA is indeed different; it's no longer about storytelling, it has to actually make money.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHerevip
· 6h ago
It's that same narrative of "Old Prophecies, New Opportunities" again. Honestly, I'm a bit tired of it. But asset tokenization is truly different; it's no longer just a faith-based play.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalistvip
· 6h ago
ngl the whole "chinese coin to moon in 26" thing screams grifter energy... but tokenized treasuries actually hitting different tho. network effects on real yield > hype cycles, that's just protocol mechanics. most ppl still don't grasp how asset composability reshapes capital efficiency across chains. they're too busy hunting the next 100x shitcoin lmao
Reply0
notSatoshi1971vip
· 6h ago
It's that article again. I said that everyone who was all in on whoever was hyped at the time went crazy. Asset tokenization is indeed reliable, but to be honest, it still depends on whether the returns can beat the market.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt