Whenever I talk about turning my principal into 400 times its original size over six years, the reactions from people around me are always the same—first they widen their eyes, then they ask if I’ve discovered some secret or found a foolproof method.

But the reality is often disappointing: my entire logic is so simple that most people would shake their heads after hearing it.

In my ten-year trading career, I’ve realized one thing—those who make trading look flashy and complicated ultimately end up just being numbers in someone else’s account. The ones who truly survive are often people like me who stick to one path all the way through.

**How I Got Here**

Two years ago, my account grew from 20,000 to 800,000. During that time, I was just like all beginners, studying everything from Fibonacci retracements, wave theory, MACD, and trying every strategy I could think of. The result was always making a profit one time, losing two times, and eventually going back to square one.

The turning point came from a decision: to throw everything away and focus only on one pattern. The N-shaped structure (violent rise → volume contraction pullback → volume breakout). Entry conditions are very rigid—cut losses when the level breaks. I never use leverage, never add to positions in parts, and never hold on stubbornly.

The next year, I grew from 800,000 to 4.8 million. During this phase, I set strict rules for myself: a 2% stop loss and a 10% take profit. I don’t draw trend lines or look at thirty indicators. My win rate was only 35%, but because I strictly followed the risk-reward ratio, I continued to make profits.

In the last six months, I reached 8 million. At that time, I only spent five minutes a day checking the four-hour chart. My logic became extremely simple: hold above the 20-day moving average, and clear the position when it drops below.

**Why This Approach Works**

The simpler something is, the easier it is to execute, and the more stable the execution, the more consistent the results. Complex strategies require frequent judgment, and the more judgments you make, the more mistakes you’re likely to make—that’s human nature. But if the rules are clear-cut—black or white—the cost of execution is actually the lowest.

This isn’t some advanced theory; it’s just returning to the basics after countless failures.