🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
$20 Billion Deal:
Why did Jensen Huang buy his fiercest enemy?
-
On Christmas night, while the world was busy with holidays, Jensen Huang (Nvidia CEO) made a chess move studied in acquisition books.
The obvious news: "Nvidia pays $20 billion for Groq technology."
But the deeper meaning:
Nvidia is admitting for the first time that its "armor" has a vulnerability.
-
To understand the story, we need to understand the difference between "training" AI and "running" it (Inference):
Nvidia is the undisputed queen of "training."
Its chips (H100 & Blackwell) are massive factories for building intelligent minds.
But when it comes to "use" (when you ask ChatGPT and it responds), Nvidia's chips are considered "an elephant in a china shop";
Very powerful, but expensive, slow, and consuming enormous energy for simple, quick tasks.
-
Here, Groq posed the real threat.
Its (LPU) technology didn't rely on raw power but on insane speed (Inference Speed).
It was 10 times faster and cheaper to operate, making it the smarter choice for companies that want to run models, not train them.
-
Why now?
And why in this way?
Bridging the only gap:
Jensen realized that the future is shifting from "building models" to "consuming them."
By acquiring Groq and its team (led by Jonathan Ross), he's not just buying a competitor but also the "speed" he lacks to dominate the entire AI lifecycle:
From heavy training to instant response.
-
The escape game from the "guillotine":
Note that the deal is not a "full acquisition" but a "technology licensing and talent hiring" strategy.
Why?
Because the DOJ (Department of Justice) would have stopped any full acquisition immediately.
Jensen cleverly "sucked in" the talent and technology, leaving the "empty shell" of the company to avoid legal battles. It's a legal workaround with engineering genius.
-
Impact on the company's (and market):
This deal kills the dreams of competitors (like AMD and Intel) in dominating the "Inference Market" (which is valued at $255 billion by 2030.
Nvidia now tells the market:
"There's no need to go elsewhere. I have the training power, and now I have the speed to run."
-
Investor takeaway:
Jensen Huang is not playing defense to defend his title but is playing to eliminate the championship altogether.
By integrating LPU technology into the CUDA ecosystem, Nvidia is transforming from a "chip company" into a "closed ecosystem" that's hard to exit.
Follow me
)and share your opinion: Do you think regulatory authorities will allow this kind of "covert acquisition" in the future?