2025-12-26 17:24:28

Participated in a spot trading event at a major exchange, and AT this coin actually showed some face by rising 50%. In theory, I made a profit, but when I opened my wallet, I only got about 2.7 U. Honestly, I’d have to spend extra money just to buy a pork knuckle rice.

What’s more heartbreaking is the comparison. The guy next door invested 1000 U to join the contest and ended up showing off 60 AT. What about my account? Everyone only managed to get 10. Asking around, it seems everyone participated in this event, but why is there such a huge difference in returns? The amount of money invested is the same, but the scale of participation is more than double, and the final results are worlds apart. Could it be that there’s some trick to the operation strategy?

AT65.31%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UnruggableChad

· 2h ago

This is the legendary case of "making 50% profit but actually losing money," a textbook example. --- Wait, why is there such a big difference between depositing 1000u and 500u? It's not just a matter of operational strategy; it feels like there's some trick in the activity mechanism itself. --- 2.7u hahaha, it's even less than the airdrop bonus. Why bother participating in such activities? --- I think the key is the liquidity pool. Accounts with less funds are definitely diluted, which is normal. --- The neighbor has 60 and you have 10, a sixfold difference. That indicates it's not just a simple ratio problem; there's some trick involved. --- Everyone participated, yet the differences are so big? That can only mean either algorithm bias or someone used special operations. --- AT increased by 50%, but only a few U's were actually received. This is the truth of spot activity, right? --- By the way, are these kinds of activities really worth participating in? It feels like just a gimmick to harvest retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 3h ago

ngl the wallet clustering here is screaming statistical anomalies... same entry conditions, completely divergent accumulation outcomes. that's not luck, that's algorithmic fingerprinting. dude probably caught the transaction velocity sweet spot you completely missed.

Reply0

rekt_but_vibing

· 3h ago

Isn't this just a pump-and-dump activity? Charging 1000 and charging 100 shouldn't give the same treatment? --- 2.7u hahaha, might as well just buy a membership for more tangible benefits --- Really? Why do I feel like exchanges are divided into tiers? --- Got it, next time just watch the game without charging money --- 60 versus 10? That difference is a bit too outrageous --- Feels like there's a scheme, on the surface claiming equality but secretly there's a difference --- Does charging more money mean you can get on the blacklist? That's hilarious --- I think this might be the usual tactic of top-tier exchanges --- Those who can make money are all insiders; retail investors like us are just here to follow along --- AT rises 50%, earning 2.7u for myself, how much does the exchange earn? --- Why ask so many questions? Anyway, we can't get a piece of that meat

View OriginalReply0

BridgeJumper

· 3h ago

You still need to spend money for 2.7U. How disappointing is this activity? How did the guy next door get 60? How did he operate? The rules might not be that transparent. It seems like those who know the tricks are making a fortune. This exchange is really incredible. The deposit limit is the same, but the returns are so different. Is a 50% increase in AT still a loss? I need to re-understand what it means to make money. Now, participating in activities requires studying the gameplay, or else you're just working for the exchange for free. The gap between 2.7U and 60AT, how big must the information gap be? Feels like I’ve been cut off by internal team members. I really can't understand this logic.

View OriginalReply0