The battle for the new Federal Reserve Chair candidate has entered a heated stage, and the underlying liquidity upheaval behind this power transition is directly threatening the trend of crypto assets.



As a key variable in global asset pricing, the policy inclination of the Federal Reserve Chair candidates has become the market's focus. Currently, the two main candidates each have their characteristics: one advocates for "cooperative rate cuts," with a nomination probability of around 47%, supported by Wall Street and the Treasury, and relatively sensitive to political pressure; the other emphasizes "Federal Reserve independence," with expectations dropping from 80% to 54%. This data-driven dovish candidate supports easing but refuses to blindly compromise.

The situation has become more complicated now. The tough stance of U.S. officials—such as outright rejection of interest rates above 1% and demands for the new chair to report directly to the White House—are impacting the Fed’s century-old tradition of independent operation. This intervention, combined with the Treasury’s intention to establish a "direct reporting line," is causing the market to reassess the likelihood of rate cuts.

Data shows the outlook is uncertain. Currently, U.S. CPI has fallen to a four-year low of 2.7%, theoretically providing room for aggressive rate cuts. However, persistent employment data improvements have become a hindrance. According to CME futures data, the probability of a rate cut in January 2026 is only 15.5%, rising to 42.2% by March. This volatility reflects extreme market uncertainty about policy prospects.

For the crypto market, this is far more than political drama. If aggressive rate cuts are ultimately implemented, global liquidity expansion will directly benefit high-risk assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Coupled with the current friendly regulatory attitude, the inflow of funds is quite possible. Conversely, if the Fed’s independence is severely undermined, leading to rising long-term interest rates, risk asset sentiment could be seriously suppressed.

The core question is: will the market ultimately favor the "easy-to-please" candidate or stick to the "independent" option? This choice could directly determine the liquidity rhythm of the crypto market in 2026.
BTC0.28%
ETH0.81%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShadowStakervip
· 5h ago
honestly the fed chair drama is just noise if you ask me... what actually matters is whether we get that liquidity injection or not. CPI at 2.7% is chef's kiss for rate cuts, but employment data keeps playing spoiler. 15.5% to 42.2% swing in 2 months? that's not signal, that's pure chaos.
Reply0
wrekt_but_learningvip
· 5h ago
Everyone is watching who the Fed Chair will choose, but I'm more concerned about whether Bitcoin will soar or fall... Can liquidity really determine everything?
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 6h ago
Uh... if we really choose the "easy to talk to" one, can BTC skyrocket? When liquidity loosens, all risk assets will have to dance along, right?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)