2026-01-02 17:23:10

Balances and transfer data on the Solana chain are completely transparent, allowing anyone to track who holds how much assets and how funds flow. This level of on-chain visibility causes practical issues for real payments, trading strategies, and institutional-grade DeFi applications.

The contradiction between privacy protection and on-chain transparency is becoming increasingly apparent. Especially for institutional participants, there are concerns that large positions being exposed could lead to front-running or sniping. The Solana ecosystem is exploring solutions through confidential transactions and privacy-enhancing protocols, which maintain necessary transparency while providing privacy layers for sensitive transactions. The application prospects of such technologies in DeFi and payment scenarios are worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityWizard

· 5h ago

Oh, transparency is transparency, but if everyone can see my wallet like this, it would be embarrassing... Solana's privacy issue should have been solved long ago, otherwise how would big players dare to make large transactions? Confidential transactions are the right way to go. Actually, it's just about wanting privacy but also enjoying the benefits of public chains. Can you have both? It feels like this privacy layer will eventually be cracked... Wait, do privacy enhancement protocols really work, or are they just another hype?

View OriginalReply0

PoolJumper

· 5h ago

That's why I never dare to deposit or withdraw large amounts, afraid of being targeted. Being tracked, honestly, must give institutions a headache. Privacy protocols need to be implemented quickly. Solana needs to find a way to establish a privacy layer; otherwise, who would feel safe trading? On-chain transparency and privacy are fundamentally incompatible. Confidential transactions should indeed be prioritized to avoid being targeted every day.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 5h ago

That's why big players are panicking—on-chain transparency is no different from front-running. Institutions are really backed into a corner and need to find ways to hide their true assets. Privacy layers must keep up; otherwise, DeFi is just a spectator event. Wait, what does regulation think about this? Solana's privacy solutions still depend on how reliable they are. Balancing transparency and privacy is truly a tough problem. The days of large funds hiding their assets might be coming.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 5h ago

Transparent blockchains should be the original intention of blockchain technology, but it still falls into the cycle of "I want privacy." Institutions fear being targeted, retail investors have no choice, and this is the eternal dilemma in the cycle. --- Privacy protocols sound like saviors, but honestly, they are just backdoors for big players. The true bottom logic lies here. --- It's funny. When building the chain, transparency was touted as the future, and now encryption is back. History loves to repeat itself this way. --- Instead of researching privacy layers, it's better to focus on how to survive the next bear market. The priorities are reversed. --- I understand that institutions want privacy, but doesn't that negate the very purpose of Solana? It's self-contradictory. --- Wait, is it time again for excessive packaging of technical solutions? What happened to those so-called "revolutionary" protocols? --- Privacy and transparency are inherently a false proposition. Adding a patch in the middle can't really solve anything. In the end, it all comes down to human nature.

View OriginalReply0

token_therapist

· 5h ago

Privacy and transparency will always be an impossible question... I'm just laughing at institutions fearing being targeted, blaming the chain for being too transparent while they dump their own holdings?

View OriginalReply0