#比特币网络升级 Saylor's words are worth pondering. His logic is actually the core principle I follow when choosing copy trading partners—**being conservative over aggressive, consensus over innovation**.

It reminds me of a previous aggressive trader I followed, who always thought about "optimizing strategies," "adding leverage," and "trying new methods." As a result, a black swan event directly wiped out the account. In contrast, those with stable returns are often refining their approach within their own framework and rarely making frequent changes. The upgrade logic of the Bitcoin protocol is actually the same— the more frequently it is changed, the greater the risk.

The threat of quantum computing will truly become a global consensus only when it reaches a critical point, not in some early stage when everyone is rushing to act. Applying this idea to copy trading strategies: **avoid following traders who frequently adjust strategies or frequently add and reduce positions**. That’s not flexibility; that’s uncertainty.

True professionalism is precisely knowing when **not to act**. Infinite funds plus ambitious developers can ruin good projects, and similarly, infinite leverage plus a desire for quick wealth can destroy your account.

Recently, while screening for new copy trading targets, I value those with "a somewhat boring conservative trading logic" even more. These traders may not give explosive returns, but they offer the chance to survive longer. Only by surviving longer can you truly earn compound interest.