Ethereum Gas fees drop to historic lows, this time truly different



Recently, something interesting happened on Ethereum—the Gas fees dropped below 0.03 Gwei, a level never seen since the mainnet launched. Chainfeeds founder Pan Zhixiong recently revealed this data. Outside of certain peak transaction times, you can even describe on-chain transaction costs as "cheap as cabbage prices."

The logic behind this is actually quite clear. Ethereum's ongoing block expansion plans are gradually being implemented, and each upgrade pushes further in the direction of lowering fees. The era of low-cost transactions is no longer just a slogan but is slowly becoming a reality. What does this mean for users? The barrier to on-chain interaction has directly lowered.

Interestingly, the overall ecosystem's approach is quietly changing. On one side, Layer 2 solutions and expansion plans are desperately trying to reduce fees; on the other side, Solana co-founder Toly has proposed a different perspective—protocols should accumulate funds to prepare for large-scale token buybacks in the future. His logic is straightforward: once protocols start large-scale buybacks and unlock tokens, the circulating tokens in the market will be re-priced, which will boost the expected value of the entire ecosystem.

You see, the strategic framework for 2026 is already taking shape quietly. Some public chains are still competing on transaction speed and costs, while others are starting to "stockpile grain for winter," building momentum for the next economic cycle. Lower fees reduce the barrier to use, while buybacks highlight long-term value. Which of these two approaches is more likely to become a game-changer? The market will soon give the answer.

What’s your view? Is the focus on lowering fees to attract users, or on buybacks to maintain value? Which side is more likely to unleash explosive growth in the next cycle?
ETH-0.72%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainTherapistvip
· 01-06 22:04
Gas fees at bargain prices, I just laugh. It feels like another wave of getting rid of retail investors. That guy from Solana said he's holding coins for buyback, but actually he's just worried about falling behind and trying to hype expectations. Lowering fees to attract users sounds good, but the real profit still goes to those who laid out early. Two routes? I think they're both illusions; the key is whether the coin price goes up or not. Is this really different this time? Bro, you say that every time.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilientvip
· 01-05 07:56
Gas prices at白菜价 back then, why wasn't anyone using it? Now they're starting to hype it up again. --- Wait, Toly, is this logic trying to make SOL also learn to hoard coins? Seems a bit like building castles in the air. --- Lowering fees to attract users has been overused; the key is still having people actually building on the chain. --- 0.03 Gwei? How come I'm still getting ripped off? This data must be the peak, haha. --- Honestly, both paths are important, but users will vote with their feet—cheaper chains will always win. --- Hoarding coins and buybacks sound great, but with ETH lowering fees, the funds are flowing to L2s. Is that contradictory? --- Starting to talk about plans for 2026 again, but it's already 2024 and we haven't figured out how to live yet. --- Gas fee reductions haven't led to increased trading volume—that's the real problem. --- This buyback strategy feels like the project team has run out of ideas, so they just throw money to pump the price. --- I just want to know, now that ETH is so cheap, are there more innovations in the ecosystem? If not, it's all pointless.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 01-05 07:55
Cheap gas fees sound great, but whether users can be retained really depends on what can be played in the ecosystem. Being cheap alone is not enough. The buyback strategy feels like an old trick; how long can holding coins last? Lowering fees is easy, but whether it can attract genuine demand is the real point. Is ETH scaling this time reliable, or is it just another round of speculative hype? Gas is cheaper, but trading volume hasn't increased? Now that's interesting. It still feels like buybacks are more straightforward—just adjust the price directly. Wait, why must it be a choice between the two? Can't both approaches be implemented simultaneously?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyervip
· 01-05 07:33
0.03Gwei cheap price is real, but will users really come back? It still depends on whether the ecosystem applications can keep up. Gas is cheaper, making it easier to harvest profits, which is also a problem. The strategy of buyback and holding coins is more like a market cycle fate than a strategy; when the bull market comes, there will naturally be someone to take over. If fees are reduced so significantly, why is the market still cold? Maybe the problem isn't with gas... Still somewhat believe in the Solana approach: the protocol needs to have its own resources to survive long-term. Just competing on costs easily leads to internal competition.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFundvip
· 01-05 07:29
No, lowering the gas fee to this level doesn't really help much; there still aren't many users... If you ask me, it's still about buybacks to boost the price—that's the real deal.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)