2026-01-05 08:21:59

When choosing exchanges to list tokens, project teams often adopt differentiated strategies. The advertising effects of top-tier trading platforms indeed vary, with brand influence, user base, and liquidity depth being key considerations. But to be honest, some project teams seem to be just trying their luck—accepting all exchanges without discrimination, which ends up diluting the initial launch effect. In contrast, truly thoughtful teams will carefully select leading platforms that align with their positioning, which is the only way to truly leverage the market. The choice of exchange essentially reflects the project's strategic clarity and is also an implicit indicator for investors to assess the project's reliability.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotSatoshi

· 01-08 08:21

Haha, just by choosing the exchange for the project, you can tell whether the team is serious or just gambling, that's right.

View OriginalReply0

SybilSlayer

· 01-06 21:49

Projects that list all currencies are basically just here to get people eliminated; it's obvious at a glance.

View OriginalReply0

faded_wojak.eth

· 01-05 08:50

Really, just by looking at the project's strategy for listing on exchanges, you can tell whether the team is capable or not. If they can get onto a comprehensive exchange, they basically pass.

View OriginalReply0

MaticHoleFiller

· 01-05 08:43

Oh no, it's those greedy projects again, rushing to list on exchanges for fear of missing out on a single dollar. The real top players have long been targeting the major exchanges with precise strikes, while the smaller ones are not even worth a glance. Choosing an exchange really shows the team's level—are they just fooling around or do they have a real plan? I heard that some project has listed on over a dozen exchanges, I just pass—aren't they just courting disaster? Picking an exchange is like choosing teammates; it’s about compatibility. Messing around will only lead to failure. You can see at a glance that reliable teams wouldn’t be so casual; bad projects will list anywhere they can. So before investing, check which exchanges they’ve chosen. I’ve already figured out this routine.

View OriginalReply0

rugdoc.eth

· 01-05 08:43

In plain terms, it's about whether the project team has a brain. I directly pass on those that are listed on all exchanges. That's not confidence; it's a lack of planning. Truly big projects have a clear understanding, and selecting just a few top ones is enough, which actually makes them more scarce.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 01-05 08:33

ngl, the exchange selection game is basically cryptographic darwinism in real time. teams that spray-and-pray every cex are evolutionary dead-ends, full stop. per my analysis, tier-1 listing strategy actually matters more than people admit—it's a systematic risk assessment tool disguised as market mechanics.

Reply0

FancyResearchLab

· 01-05 08:33

Another useless innovation. When it comes to exchange selection, it's politely called a strategy, but in reality, it's just about who can spend money to buy popularity.

View OriginalReply0

DYORMaster

· 01-05 08:30

That's right, these days there's a flood of new tokens, with every exchange listing them all at once, and as a result, no one remembers you. A truly experienced team has long understood that you need to precisely target the top projects.

View OriginalReply0