Have you ever wondered why those who are truly wealthy tend to be especially frugal?



It's not meanness; it's a complete logic— they see spending money and investing money as the same thing. As long as it doesn't bring a positive return, they won't buy it no matter how cheap; as long as it's high-value, they'll buy it without hesitation even if it's expensive.

Look at how top wealth creators do it, and you'll understand.

**Warren Buffett's Dual Life**

On one hand, this guy is famously stingy. He bought a house in 1958 for $31,500 and has lived in it for over sixty years without moving. He drinks only $3 Coca-Cola daily, eats cheap McDonald's meals, and rarely wears a tie. He saves on parking fees, and if convenience store snacks go up a few cents, he just drops them—truly outrageous.

But on the other hand? He has spent billions acquiring quality companies like See's Candies, Coca-Cola, and Apple, even if they are expensive. He promises to donate 99% of his wealth to charity. He spends tens of thousands of dollars attending top dinners to network with experts. These moves are far from small.

He himself explains it clearly: "The happiness from a luxury house is far less than the compound interest benefits of investing that money." In other words, his restraint in daily consumption reflects his reverence for compound interest.

**Duan Yongping's "Chinese Version"**

This guy is even more extraordinary. He often wears casual clothes and sneakers, eats affordable fast food on the street, and has no airs. Luxury cars, watches, mansions? Not interested at all. Almost all his earnings are invested in the stock market—NetEase, Apple, Moutai, holding heavy positions.

His logic is the same: "Dressing well and eating expensive doesn't make me happier, nor does it help me make better decisions. The money should go to companies that create value."

Interestingly, this investment discipline extends to daily life—he never pays for "limited edition" items. If he doesn't see value, even for a small amount, he won't spend it. This is completely consistent with his principle of "never buying overvalued stocks."

But what if a good opportunity arises? He heavily invested 270 million USD in NetEase's bottom fishing, then later allocated large sums to Apple and Moutai, even participating in private placements at a premium. The reason is simple: "Good companies deserve high valuations. Investing in them yields returns far beyond any consumption."

**Munger's "Rational Consumerism"**

Buffett's golden partner, Charlie Munger, has ingrained frugality into his bones. In his youth, he saved and invested his entire salary in the stock market; in old age, he remains remarkably modest—ordinary houses, ordinary cars, never chasing material pleasures.

His most extreme principle: not buying "useless things." If a book doesn't inspire him, it's a waste of money. When dining with Buffett, they split the bill; if the food is too expensive, he proactively changes venues. Is he stingy or not?

His words are very piercing: "Spending money casually is an irrational habit, and this habit can transfer to mistakes in investing."

But what about high-value items? He fully supports acquiring quality companies, holding top stocks, and is never stingy. He spends a lifetime buying books, attending lectures, and making friends with wise people—because he firmly believes that "cognition determines the upper limit of wealth; spending money on knowledge is the highest return on investment."

**The underlying logic is actually so simple**

The stories of these three people all tell the same thing: their consumption decisions and investment decisions are based on the same framework.

Their restraint isn't stinginess; it's reverence for compound interest loss. Those daily expenses? Wasting the compounding space of time and money.

Their generosity isn't extravagance; it's confidence in high-value returns. The money they spend? It’s spent to generate multiple or even dozens of times the return.

So the key isn't whether you spend more or less, but whether every penny you spend truly brings positive returns to your life or wealth. That’s the biggest difference between the wealthy and ordinary people.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WenMoonvip
· 01-08 20:01
To be honest, the idea that Buffett has lived in the same old house for 60 years is a bit exaggerated, but the logic is indeed solid. Why do I feel like spending money is a bottomless pit? Looks like I need to learn this framework. The power of compound interest can truly change a person's consumption mindset. I want to try it too. This move by Duan Yongping feels a bit like the minimalist approach of small-town exam takers. Munger's words hit hard. My casual spending habits really do influence my investment decisions. Why do I always feel like I can never make money? Maybe the problem isn't earning but spending.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMinervip
· 01-08 06:43
It's not wrong to say that, but where does a working stiff like me have money to invest? --- Warren Buffett saves money for compound interest, I save money for next month's rent. --- Damn, it turns out that my years of poverty were actually just an investment budget. --- Why do I always feel like this logic is just finding reasons for my poverty... --- It's enlightening, but for someone with no principal, it's like saying nothing. --- That's why I can never live the life of the rich, because I don't have the first bucket of gold. --- Laughing to death, I also save money very well, but I just haven't become rich. --- Zhang Yongping's example is really brilliant; if I had heavily invested in NetEase, I would have gone bankrupt directly.
View OriginalReply0
ILCollectorvip
· 01-06 17:44
That's right, the core is ROI thinking. Do you understand?
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpandervip
· 01-05 22:51
Buffett has lived in the same house for over 60 years, and I even want to change my rented house... the gap is really huge.
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreathervip
· 01-05 22:47
Oh no, it's another article titled "Rich People Have a Reason," which is not wrong but doesn't say anything new. They can afford to be picky because they are truly wealthy; we are forced to save because we have no money. Speaking of which, it's hard to tell if it's frugality or real stinginess; it depends on the return rate. I've heard the compound interest theory so many times, but the problem is I don't even have principal. Buffett has lived in the same house for 60 years; if it were me, I would have been forced to take out a loan to buy a new house long ago. Why does it feel like these wealthy people's "frugality" is not the same as our thrift and austerity? The wealthy's saving is a strategy; for those with no money, saving is truly despairing.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sippervip
· 01-05 22:45
That's right, but most people simply can't do it because they can't distinguish what true returns are. Makes sense, which is why I will always be poor. Buffett has lived in the same house for 60 years without moving; I still haven't paid off my mortgage. I agree with the concept of reverence for compound interest, but ordinary people like us really find it hard to stick with it. The most heartbreaking part is the phrase "consumption and investment use the same framework." How did I not think of that? Duan Yongping's logic is brilliant, but since we all work 996, who has the time to research high-value investments? This article is well written, but I still end up spending money recklessly after reading it haha. The key is to earn enough before you dare to be so frugal. How can you compound interest when you have no money?
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirstvip
· 01-05 22:43
Wow, Buffett has been living in a dilapidated house for 60 years, I can't help but laugh out loud. This is the real hidden billionaire... And me? Limited edition sneakers one after another, paying the IQ tax, I'm speechless.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDivervip
· 01-05 22:36
Basically, you need to clearly distinguish between what is investment and what is consumption, but most people simply can't tell the difference. Buffett's approach is indeed impressive, but ordinary people like us can't learn it... Yeah, I agree with this logic, but the problem is that most people simply don't have the discipline to follow through. Really, the key is ROI, but most people don't even have this concept. Compound interest is the way to go, but unfortunately, too few realize this. It's insightful, but I feel most people still can't resist the desire to consume. This is probably the gap between cognition and execution.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 01-05 22:33
This logic sounds correct, but I still can't get past the psychological barrier. Saving a few bucks on McDonald's while investing billions is truly a stark psychological difference.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)