A major crypto theft case just took an unexpected turn. Ilya Lichtenstein, the figure behind the 2016 heist that grabbed over 119,000 Bitcoin, got shifted from prison to home confinement. The White House came out defending this move—though notably, they stopped short of claiming credit for it.



This decision raises eyebrows in the crypto community. On one hand, it signals that authorities are handling high-profile crypto crime cases with some nuance. On the other, questions linger: what actually triggered the shift? Was it legal grounds, new evidence, or something else entirely?

The silence around who pushed for this is telling. Whether it reshapes how the market views enforcement around major theft cases remains to be seen. One thing's clear though—cases involving this volume of Bitcoin always draw attention.
BTC0.39%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SurvivorshipBiasvip
· 01-09 00:39
119,000 Bitcoins can be released so easily? The entire community should be on alert.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinionvip
· 01-08 23:25
The White House's move is outrageous; there must be some trick involved.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPhobiavip
· 01-08 10:13
Holy crap, 119,000 Bitcoins moved from prison to home? This plot twist is too crazy, even the White House has to come out and explain... Who's really pulling the strings behind the scenes?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiGraylingvip
· 01-08 06:35
The feeling of the White House passing the buck is incredible; no one wants to take responsibility for this.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChainvip
· 01-06 01:53
What kind of riddle is the White House playing? They're being so vague... Is there some shady deal going on?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobovip
· 01-06 01:53
The White House's recent move is really a bit outrageous. What's the act? If you don't want to take the blame, just say so.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.ethvip
· 01-06 01:50
The White House's move is so ambiguous—wanting to speak out but not wanting to take the blame... I really can't see what they mean.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAnxietyvip
· 01-06 01:46
The White House is even helping to spin this, this move looks just outrageous...
View OriginalReply0
MevHuntervip
· 01-06 01:30
Is it the same old story again? The White House is passing the buck, no one dares to take responsibility... hilarious
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)