2026-01-08 19:20:55

In the finance industry, it is very difficult to control the level of information exposure. Banks and asset management firms must prove their financial health and compliance with regulatory requirements, but the key information must never be fully disclosed—trade strategies, client resources, internal processes are all vital secrets. Unfortunately, traditional public blockchains make this even more complicated: while fully transparent ledgers sound appealing, they also pose risks of unintentionally revealing trading strategies, client information, and operational details.

This is the core contradiction that privacy-focused projects aim to solve. The idea is actually simple: build a system that ensures the right people see the right information at the right time. This way, compliance review needs are met without exposing the company's operational secrets.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerRugResistant

· 01-08 20:48

Basically, it's about finding a balance between transparency and privacy. The fully open logic of public blockchains can indeed easily kill enterprises.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 01-08 19:46

Transparency and privacy are always a deadlock. Public chains haven't really figured it out yet. Decentralization was promised, but all operations are exposed completely. This is a nightmare for institutional players. There's still some imagination space in the privacy track, but it depends on who can really develop something usable. This selective information disclosure logic sounds simple, but implementing it involves all kinds of devilish details. It seems that a bit of compromise from both Web2 and Web3 sides is necessary.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 01-08 19:44

Basically, the idea of "transparency" is actually a false proposition in finance... Public blockchains were originally thought to have the advantage of transparent ledgers, but it turned out to be a vulnerability. Now, privacy projects have to step in to patch the holes.

View OriginalReply0

NFTragedy

· 01-08 19:39

In simple terms, you can't have both fish and bear paws; transparency and privacy are always at odds. This is the true value of privacy coins — they are not meant to hide illegal funds, but are an essential tool for financial institutions.

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 01-08 19:35

Well said, transparency and privacy are always on opposite ends of the spectrum. Public chain transparency is a feature, but for enterprises, it's a nightmare—transaction strategies are laid bare... The privacy track indeed needs to gain popularity.

View OriginalReply0

ForkThisDAO

· 01-08 19:35

Basically, this is the eternal tug-of-war between privacy and transparency. Public chain players need to find a way to break the deadlock.

View OriginalReply0

AirDropMissed

· 01-08 19:28

That's right, transparency and privacy are really incompatible. The public chain's approach of "showing you everything" sounds impressive, but in reality, anyone can access your transaction records. This is a nightmare for institutional clients.

View OriginalReply0