Most DAO projects give the impression of being slow, cumbersome, and lacking participation. Once a proposal is submitted, it enters a long waiting period, funds turnover efficiency is low, and community members' enthusiasm gradually diminishes.



But there is a project that breaks this old pattern. It integrates on-chain voting with intelligent fund pools, reducing the time from proposal submission to actual execution to an average of only 48 hours. What does this mean? Within two days of submitting a proposal, you can see the flow of funds and observe the execution results, truly feeling that your participation is meaningful.

The incentive design is also quite attractive. The community reward pool has already accumulated over 500,000 USDC, and monthly profits are distributed based on your token holdings and participation level. Whether you're a large holder or a small investor, you can earn real returns through governance. This design makes long-term participation a worthwhile endeavor.

From a technical perspective, the project uses multi-signature wallets combined with automated scripts to execute operations, significantly reducing risk while ensuring transparency and security throughout the process. After the launch of cross-chain governance, the efficiency of asset scheduling is expected to improve by another 30-40 percentage points.

In the DAO world, speed equals value. Whoever can make participants both decision-makers and beneficiaries will seize the future.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainSpyvip
· 3h ago
48-hour results? This is what DAO should look like. Finally, someone has figured it out. --- Honestly, most DAOs are just empty talk. This speed truly breaks the norm. --- A reward pool of over 500,000 USDC, even small retail investors can participate? Just this point alone is worth paying attention to. --- On-chain voting combined with smart fund pools, a good combination punch. But I worry about potential hiccups during execution. --- Really addresses the participation issue; otherwise, proposal failures would be disheartening. --- The multi-signature wallet risk control measures are quite good, and transparency is in place. --- Can cross-chain governance launch efficiency be improved by 30-40%? That might be a bit of an overstatement; it depends on actual implementation. --- This is true community governance, not just slogan-shouting. --- Feels like I've found my favorite, finally no more waiting forever. --- Fast capital turnover means what? It means you can quickly see the true face of a project.
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployervip
· 22h ago
Execution in 48 hours? That's even shorter than the time I usually wait for proposals. That's a bit exaggerated. --- A reward pool of 500,000 USDC sounds good, but how much can actually be distributed is still a question mark. --- Finally, someone made DAO work properly. The previous projects were really awkward to me. --- Multi-signature + automation scripts, this combination can indeed reduce a lot of risks. Thumbs up. --- Speed = value, that's true, but only if what is being executed is really valuable. --- Can small retail investors also share dividends? I want to see what happens when 500,000 is distributed among a few thousand people. --- On-chain voting combined with smart fund pools, why hasn't anyone tried this combination before? --- Cross-chain governance efficiency increased by 30-40%? Where did this number come from? --- Seeing results in two days, this really gives a sense of participation, much better than waiting three months. --- Fast governance is a good thing, but rushing can easily lead to deviations. Is risk control really reliable?
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQvip
· 22h ago
one might argue the 48-hour execution paradigm mirrors walter benjamin's observations on mechanical reproducibility, except here the mechanism is distributed consensus rather than industrial production... fascinating deconstruction of governance theater tbh
Reply0
ForkLibertarianvip
· 22h ago
48-hour execution? Compared to projects that take half a year, it's definitely much faster, but it still depends on whether there's any actual substance in the operation.
View OriginalReply0
potentially_notablevip
· 22h ago
Execute within 48 hours? Wow, that's truly a秒杀 level compared to some DAOs. --- A reward pool of 500,000 USDC? Even small retail investors can share? Honestly, it's a bit tempting. --- It's either multi-signature wallets or automated scripts, which definitely seem to reduce risks quite a bit. --- Sounds good, but the key is how the cross-chain launch goes later; otherwise, all efforts are pointless. --- I believe in seeing results in two days, much better than proposals that get stuck for three to five months. --- Both big and small investors can profit. This incentive design deserves a thumbs up... Wait, could it be a rug pull? --- Speed = value. No doubt about that. Early execution and feedback really help retain users. --- Over 500,000 USDC? The community must be quite large; I’ve never heard of it before. --- On-chain voting combined with intelligent fund pools sounds like there's no technical barrier. Why didn't anyone do this earlier? --- If it can improve efficiency by 30-40 points, then on the day cross-chain governance goes live, it's time to go all in. --- Honestly, compared to those half-dead DAOs, this project is indeed a bit interesting.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeItvip
· 22h ago
48-hour execution? If that's true, it really changes the game. The DAOs that only move every few months have already given me brain fatigue. --- A reward pool of over 500,000 USDC sounds good, but how long can this kind of incentive last? I'm a bit worried it might be just a flash in the pan. --- Multi-signature plus automation scripts—this combo indeed solves the trust issues we had before. But we still need to see how it performs after cross-chain deployment. --- Retail investors can also get real money? That's unlikely. The influence of big players still dominates. --- Speed = value. This statement is correct, but being fast isn't always good. Small issues in details can still lead to failure. --- Finally, a project realizes that the biggest pain point of DAO isn't the code but people's enthusiasm. It's truly enlightening. --- Two days to produce the execution results? How many people are needed for 24-hour maintenance afterward? Has the cost been factored in? --- Feels like more hype. Let's wait until cross-chain is truly live. The promises and actual implementation are still miles apart.
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯vip
· 22h ago
Results in 48 hours? Sure, finally a DAO dares to get serious --- I admire this incentive pool design; small investors can also share the pie, much better than those exclusive big whale strategies --- Multi-signature scripts reduce risk, sounds good, but what about the execution details? Can I see the source code? --- Speed = value, this statement is bold, now it depends on how long it can be maintained without failure --- Over 500,000 USDC? When will I see real money landing in my wallet? To be honest, I’m a bit hesitant --- Results in two days, if this can really be achieved, other DAO projects will be panicking --- Asset reallocation can still improve by 30-40%, is that theoretical or based on actual tests? Don’t give me another PPT promise --- Cross-chain governance sounds appealing, but what about the risks? Can’t just listen to the good parts
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddictvip
· 22h ago
Results in 48 hours? That's nearly a hundred times faster than the last proposal approval. Alright, I'm convinced.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)