The Web3 ecosystem will face an unavoidable challenge in 2026: data storage. As AI applications explode in growth, traditional decentralized storage solutions are either prohibitively expensive or lack flexibility, becoming a bottleneck for on-chain application expansion.



Walrus Protocol offers an alternative based on real data. This storage system, built on the Sui blockchain, uses Reed-Solomon erasure coding technology to reduce storage costs to one five-hundredth of Arweave's level, with data availability reaching 99.99%. It may sound like just numbers, but the underlying value is: it’s cheap, and can dynamically modify and delete data, making compliance requirements like GDPR no longer a nightmare for decentralized storage.

In practical applications, this solution has already been adopted by projects within the Sui ecosystem. Projects like Tusky and TradePort, after integration, handle an average of over 10PB of data daily, covering everything from NFT metadata to AI training datasets. This indicates that the demand is real, and commercial deployment is underway.

Even more interesting is the cross-chain design. Walrus’s interoperability architecture breaks the constraints of storage services being tied to a single chain. Data is no longer just the private property of a specific blockchain but can flow across chains. As leading exchanges evaluate listing its token and collaborations with AI infrastructure projects like Bittensor deepen, this project is expanding from a data layer role within the Sui ecosystem to a broader multi-chain space.
WAL6.57%
SUI-0.58%
AR0.73%
TAO-4.53%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
potentially_notablevip
· 22h ago
Cut the cost down to one five-hundredth? That number sounds a bit suspicious; we need to see if it actually works in practice. Walrus is indeed working on storage, but the cross-chain description is a bit exaggerated. Let's wait until it actually lands. 10PB sounds impressive, but how is this data calculated? Has it been verified by a third party in the industry? Reed-Solomon erasure coding technology is useful, but can the cost really be pushed that low? I'm a bit skeptical; we need to see follow-up data. Deep collaboration with Bittensor? What exactly is the form of this partnership? Is there actual output or just talk? Storage costs at one five-hundredth... Feels like hype. Is the real cost comparison really that exaggerated? GDPR compliance is a real need; I have to admit Walrus has thought of this from that perspective.
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlockervip
· 22h ago
Bro, one in 500 cost? That number sounds a bit suspicious; I need to see real-world data to believe it. Someone should have addressed the storage pain point long ago; traditional solutions are really lacking. Cross-chain is interesting, but we should wait until exchanges actually go live before discussing it. Right now, it's all just PPT. 10PB is really impressive; if it can run stably, that would be a good direction.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperervip
· 22h ago
ngl the 1/500th cost thesis is where the behavioral signal gets interesting... watching whether whale addresses actually cluster around Walrus nodes or if this stays theoretical accumulation. pattern recognition says the cross-chain interop angle kills the narrative quick if execution falters
Reply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 22h ago
Oh no, more good news from the Sui ecosystem. Is the data storage really sorted out this time? The cost of one five-hundredth sounds unbelievable, but I always feel there's a catch. If the Walrus cross-chain move really works, then storage will no longer be isolated islands operated independently by each chain. That's interesting. But honestly, 99.99% availability sounds perfect, yet there have been quite a few online failures... Let's wait and see how Tusky and others perform after some time, don't rush to get on board.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChainvip
· 22h ago
Whoa, one five-hundredth of Arweave? That number sounds a bit outrageous. Is it real? Sui seems to have come up with something this time.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 22h ago
Reduce costs to one five-hundredth? That number sounds unbelievable. Only if it can be practically implemented in real scenarios does it count.
View OriginalReply0
BakedCatFanboyvip
· 22h ago
It sounds like Walrus is seriously addressing real-world problems, but I'm still curious—how long can this 1/500 cost advantage last? --- Over at Arweave, they need to keep an eye on things, or they'll be hit by a dimensionality reduction blow. --- Cross-chain has real potential, but can compliance really be handled so easily? --- A daily processing volume of 10PB sounds impressive, and 99.99% availability is also good—just want to know what the actual operational costs are. --- The Sui ecosystem has released a new usable product, and the pace is much faster than last year. --- The partnership with Bittensor is interesting; the demand for AI storage is definitely picking up. --- GDPR support is a plus, but the true test of decentralized storage is whether it can remain stable in extreme scenarios. --- Reed-Solomon erasure coding is old news; the key is how Walrus implements it. --- Low prices are good, but don't fall into the trap of "burning money through subsidies." --- Token listing evaluation in progress... same old script again, let's wait and see the actual deployment data.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)