Behind the rapid growth of AI models, GPU budgets are soaring, but few people pay attention to the hidden risks of data storage—an unexpected outage could mean starting the entire training cycle over from scratch.



This is why distributed storage solutions are beginning to gain attention. Take Walrus Protocol as an example; its approach is to disperse data across a global network of nodes, ensuring real-time accessibility through random availability challenges. If a node goes offline, the staked $WAL tokens will be slashed. Compared to a pure PoS mechanism, this form of punishment is more direct and better incentivizes nodes to stay stable.

Talus Network has already made a prototype on this path. They deploy DeFi-strategy AI on distributed storage, writing each model iteration on-chain. This not only mitigates the risk of centralized server crashes but also opens a window for external audits. Even more interesting is the accompanying on-chain access control mechanism, where the team can sell model invocation rights with time windows. After users unlock with $WAL, the smart contract automatically grants read permissions. The entire process is transparent and traceable, with clear ownership of models and costs transparently distributed.

As blockchain games and advertising platforms flood into the ecosystem, the types of stored data have expanded from simple CSV files to large files like 4K videos and 3D models. The Red Stuff encoding scheme ensures that even with large file sizes, usability and access speed are not compromised. AI-generated content truly achieves "on-chain and ready to use."

From an economic model perspective, the 2026 roadmap indicates that the Slashing mechanism and short-term staking fees will soon be launched in tandem, with each trigger causing token burns. Under the logic of gradually shrinking supply, $WAL has evolved from network fuel to a scarce asset.

The ecosystem fund continues to roll out RFPs covering AI datasets, market inference algorithms, privacy medical data, and other niche areas, attracting talent and capital to flow into this space.
WAL-4.14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DataChiefvip
· 4h ago
GPU is burning money like crazy, but storage is an hidden pitfall. A single disconnection can wipe out the entire disk, who can stand that? WAL's slashing mechanism is directly more severe, harsher than pure PoS, nodes must honestly do their work. Wait, do we still need to burn tokens in 2026? Is the supply contraction meant to create scarcity? I need to study Talus's on-chain auditing approach. Transparency is indeed a selling point. Red Stuff encoding can handle 4K and 3D, which makes sense. Otherwise, putting large files on-chain would be a joke. Where is the ecosystem fund RFP? Has anyone grabbed the privacy medical sector? This direction seems promising.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivorvip
· 01-09 20:00
We all understand that GPUs are expensive, but very few people take storage risks seriously. A single downtime can be heartbreaking. The WAL slashing mechanism is indeed tough and more effective than pure PoS in addressing node downtime issues. I like Talus's on-chain auditing and access control approach. The transparency is maximized, which is the way Web3 should be. The red stuff encoding sounds impressive—being able to ensure speed even with large files? If it really gets implemented, it will definitely change the game. If the burning mechanism is linked in 2026, the scarcity of WAL will increase. Those who are hoarding now will be the ones laughing. The directions for the ecosystem fund RFP look promising, but it still depends on who can actually deliver results.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilientvip
· 01-08 22:23
GPU money-burning machines, but no one manages the data? Walrus's logic of distributed storage + slashing is indeed fierce, and it feels like it has more substance compared to those superficial storage projects. Wait, Talus writes the entire model iteration on-chain, how much pressure does that put on the project team during the audit window... Full transparency actually makes it a bit more exciting. I can't quite see through the supply contraction play of $WAL, 2026 is still early, but if this burning logic is overused, wouldn't it become artificial scarcity... Red Bull coding scheme supports 4K and 3D models on-chain, the technical details here are really substantial, unlike some projects that just hype. The ecosystem fund is invested in medical data privacy, is this a direction that dares to be touched, and how is the regulatory risk calculated?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 01-08 20:49
GPU burning money is really something no one wants, but storage outages directly lead to GG, which is the real killer move. Walrus's approach of random challenges + slashing is indeed fierce; nodes that slack off get their coins deducted. It's much more reliable than those虚的PoS mechanisms. But speaking of which, Talus putting model iterations on the chain? That cost must be huge, gas fees would be astronomical. Reminds me of a previous project’s outage incident—retraining the model from scratch, millions just gone... So, the path of distributed systems is indeed the way to go. Uploading 4K videos on-chain feels ahead of its time. Can Red Stuff encoding really handle the speed of large files? Wait, in 2026, Slashing + short-term staking linkage—are they laying the groundwork for $WAL's deflationary expectations?
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairyvip
· 01-08 20:48
slashing mechanics going live in 2026? ngl that's when the real arbitrage starts getting interesting... watching $WAL supply dynamics like a hawk rn
Reply0
PanicSeller69vip
· 01-08 20:43
GPU throwing money into the sea, data crashes as soon as it disconnects—no one really wants to see these details WAL staking + reduction mechanism is pretty good, much harsher than pure PoS, nodes dare to go offline and get cut Talus's on-chain iteration this time has some substance; finally someone is taking audit transparency seriously If the burning logic in 2026 is implemented, WAL indeed has scarcity, but I'm worried it might become another inflation monster The dense RFP releases for the ecosystem fund—are there really players involved or is it just storytelling again? Red Stuff encoding supporting large files truly solves a pain point, but the "on-chain and ready to use" tagline is still a bit overhyped
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffetvip
· 01-08 20:41
Damn, storage discontinuity retraining is indeed an invisible bomb Dispersed storage + slashing mechanism, this logic is quite harsh WAL's staking design is definitely more compelling compared to pure PoS On-chain writing iteration is a brilliant move, audit transparency is directly maximized But can Red Stuff encoding really handle large files like 4K and 3D? Curious about actual performance Supply contraction in 2026, if the burning logic kicks in, it's definitely worth paying attention to The directions of the ecosystem fund RFP are quite good, especially the privacy and healthcare sectors with lots of imagination
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdropvip
· 01-08 20:40
Everyone knows that GPU burning money is a thing, but the risk of the storage collapse causing the entire project to be buried is really easy to overlook. Wait, isn't Walrus's punishment mechanism a bit harsh... directly reducing staked tokens and really implementing it? Talus's idea of on-chain iteration of AI models is pretty good, and the transparency of audits has indeed improved. The deflationary logic of $WAL is quite interesting. Will the combined effect of slashing in 2026 and short-term staking fees really shrink the supply?
View OriginalReply0
token_therapistvip
· 01-08 20:26
Everyone knows that GPU burning money is a thing, but the real bottleneck is still storage... A single outage can cause more than just financial loss. Walrus's slashing mechanism is indeed fierce, much more powerful than ordinary PoS. Talus's approach is quite good—writing model iterations on-chain, making audits clearer. But what about the cost? The token economics design of $WAL is quite interesting; the burn mechanism expected to go live in 2026 will likely trigger some action.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)