Currently, in the blockchain ecosystem, there are not many solutions that truly cater to institutional finance. The common scenarios are: some chains stubbornly pursue decentralization, while others emphasize data transparency at all costs. However, both share a common Achilles' heel — the inability to balance privacy and regulation. Privacy and compliance are often seen as opposites, but what if these two could be integrated?



Dusk Foundation has this very idea. The problem it aims to solve is very practical: suppose you manage a fund and want to put bonds or fund shares on the chain. The options before you are quite awkward — using a regular chain means data is fully transparent, exposing institutional information completely, which poses huge risks; switching to a privacy chain preserves data confidentiality, but regulators cannot verify compliance. This situation makes on-chain activity for institutions seem like an "impossible triangle."

Dusk's approach is: why not pursue both? Through an auditable privacy infrastructure, ordinary users cannot see sensitive on-chain asset data, but regulators, with proper authorization, can verify compliance. Privacy and compliance are no longer enemies but can coexist.

The project itself is quite active. The mainnet is already live, and the ecosystem fund has invested tens of millions of DUSK to support various on-chain financial applications, from securitization to compliant lending and asset trading protocols, forming a fairly complete layout. The logic behind the DUSK token is also clear: transaction fees, staking rewards, and smart contract execution costs — it’s not a token for idle speculation. Technologically, DuskVM is used to deploy privacy contracts, while DuskEVM ensures fast migration of Ethereum applications. The dual-engine architecture significantly lowers the development threshold. This design allows Dusk to simultaneously meet privacy needs and ecosystem expansion.
DUSK3.62%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ETHReserveBankvip
· 8h ago
Can privacy and compliance really be balanced? This is the way institutional-level applications should go, not an either-or choice.
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorVikingvip
· 21h ago
auditable privacy infrastructure actually sounds battle-tested... if the uptime metrics hold up under institutional load, ngl this could shift the needle on compliance finality.
Reply0
OnchainSnipervip
· 21h ago
Can privacy and compliance truly coexist? It's easy to say, but the key is how it is implemented.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlItvip
· 21h ago
Can privacy and compliance truly coexist? Sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just another PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffetvip
· 21h ago
Is privacy and compliance really able to merge? I'm a bit curious about this auditable privacy system. --- It's another story of institutional finance. Whether it can truly be implemented remains to be seen. --- The dual-engine architecture sounds impressive, but will developers really buy into it? --- Tens of millions of DUSK poured in; this ecosystem fund is indeed generous. --- For the impossible triangle, forcing it to be perfect—can arbitrage still exist in the middle? --- There are many privacy chains; why does this one claim it can handle two at the same time? --- DuskVM plus DuskEVM—this setup is quite elaborate. --- How can compliance verification ensure that regulators can really pretend not to see? --- The mainnet is up and running, but the ecosystem is still key. Let's watch and see. --- Do institutions really lack this, or is it just another self-indulgent project?
View OriginalReply0
DYORMastervip
· 21h ago
Alright, finally someone has reconciled the pair of rivals, privacy and compliance. Dusk's approach is indeed brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 21h ago
Hmm, can privacy and compliance be compatible? It seems easy to say but hard to do. --- Dusk's auditable privacy logic indeed addresses the pain points, and institutions finally don't have to choose between the two. --- The dual-engine architecture sounds good, but I wonder how efficient it will actually run in practice. --- DUSK's token design has a logical structure, which is better than those pure pump-and-dump tokens, but it still depends on how much the ecosystem can truly attract institutions. --- Ultimately, it's a gamble on whether this privacy + compliance combo can open up the institutional market. Time will prove everything. --- Investing tens of millions of DUSK shows sincerity, but it depends on whether truly competitive applications can be incubated. --- I think the key is whether regulators will really cooperate; having a technical solution in place is not enough.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)