I strongly agree with this point. That’s why we continue to support projects that truly develop excellent technology, such as what Billions Network is building.



Ultimately, what is the difference between Billions and other identity verification projects? I’ve summarized three core points:

Most identity projects focus on compliance checks, but Billions takes a different approach — it emphasizes actual technological innovation. This difference in thinking determines that the development paths of the two types of projects are completely different. The projects that can truly survive are those that solve real problems, not just meet regulatory requirements.

These three differences are enough to explain why Billions can stand out in the identity verification track.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StakeOrRegretvip
· 17h ago
Well... To be honest, the Billions strategy really has some substance, much more reliable than those projects that only focus on compliance. --- Another identity verification project? They talk about differences every day, I’d like to see how they actually do it. --- Technological innovation vs. compliance checks, this perspective is quite fresh, but real implementation is the true test of strength. --- Is Billions really that capable? Or is it just another overhyped concept? --- Good points, but only one of the three core aspects was mentioned... what about the other two? --- Web3 identity definitely needs technical expertise; just compliance isn’t enough. --- That’s what they say, but projects that can survive are already few. Let’s see how it goes.
View OriginalReply0
GasGuruvip
· 01-08 20:56
To be honest, when it comes to identity verification, it really depends on who is genuinely working on the technology, not just talking big. The idea behind Billions is indeed different.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesisvip
· 01-08 20:53
On-chain data shows that the deployment logic of Billions' contract is indeed interesting in that it doesn't follow the traditional compliance route. From the code, the differences are indeed obvious.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrantvip
· 01-08 20:45
Hmm, technological innovation is indeed more valuable than just compliance positioning. This logic holds up. Only those who truly survive are the real winners. It's not just me saying that, Billions is on the right track.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Banditvip
· 01-08 20:28
ngl, seen this play out before... compliance-first projects always hit the difficulty wall eventually. billions actually building > billions talking about building, that's the difference
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt