Any project that wants to break through cannot avoid a harsh reality — surviving in the wave of opportunities while facing real market tests.



Dusk Network approaches this with the positioning of "compliant privacy," which indeed puts it at the forefront, but the road ahead is also filled with thorns.

Let's first look at the positive side. The trend of asset tokenization is already very clear and is being promoted worldwide. Dusk's collaboration with licensed institutions like 21X has established a viable model, which is very likely to become its first practical application scenario. Additionally, as traditional financial institutions begin to explore DeFi, their demand for transaction privacy and position privacy will become increasingly urgent, and this is exactly the pain point that Dusk's technology can solve. Backed by top-tier capital (such as a leading investment fund), and engaging in technical cooperation with partners like Harmony, the resource reserves are still quite sufficient.

But there are also many challenges. First is the technical balance — privacy protection, network throughput (TPS), and operational efficiency — excelling at all three simultaneously is inherently difficult. Second, the concept of "compliant privacy" is relatively unfamiliar; convincing developers and users of its value requires significant effort in market education. Moreover, both the privacy track and the public chain track are highly competitive, so Dusk must quickly establish its own competitive barriers. The $15 million developer fund investment becomes especially critical in this context.

Ultimately, Dusk has chosen the right path, but this road is bound to be difficult. The final success or failure depends on how quickly the technology can iterate, how broad the ecosystem can grow, and whether it can seize the historical opportunity of institutional asset onboarding. As an observer, patience is needed, and it’s also worth maintaining expectations.
DUSK9,49%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FUD_Whisperervip
· 7h ago
Compliance and privacy sound good, but the key is whether TPS can keep up; otherwise, no matter how compliant it is, it’s useless. --- Is a 15 million fund really enough? It seems like projects in the privacy track burn through money very quickly. --- 21X partnership sounds reliable, but implementation has never been easy. Let’s wait and see. --- Traditional finance indeed needs privacy, but will they really adopt Dusk? Not so sure. --- Basically, it’s a gamble on whether it can iterate quickly; otherwise, it’s very likely to be overshadowed by Monero and Zcash. --- Feels like another "great concept, hard to realize" project—there are too many of these in the circle. --- Having a backing from a VC is useful, but the main thing is whether the product can truly solve problems.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChainvip
· 01-08 22:37
Compliance and privacy sound good, but many people have fallen into pitfalls on the privacy path. Can Dusk break through? Oh wait, let's still look at the ecosystem. Whether the developer fund can truly retain talent is the key. Speaking of asset tokenization, it is indeed the trend, but I'm worried Dusk will become the loudest name again. The on-chain opportunity window for institutions won't wait for anyone. Hurry up and iterate, my friend. Can Dusk break the curse of choosing two out of privacy, throughput, and efficiency? Instead of listening to marketing words, it's better to wait for ecosystem data to speak. The partnership with Harmony sounds like a plus, but ecosystem bleeding also needs to be guarded against. With a $15 million developer fund, it depends on how it's spent. Throwing money away would be too ridiculous. Market education costs are easily overlooked. "Compliance and privacy" must be backed by real cases.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarryvip
· 01-08 22:31
Compliance and privacy sound good, but how many can really get it running? Balancing TPS and privacy is too difficult. In my opinion, whether the 15 million fund can produce results depends on execution; just having money isn't enough. That 21X partnership is indeed a good starting point, but whether it can be replicated later remains to be seen. The on-chain institutional trend is real, but whether Dusk can seize it is another matter. The privacy race is as fierce as public chains; playing both together is even more exciting.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLickervip
· 01-08 22:29
Compliance and privacy sound good, but can this concept really sell? It still depends on whether the ecosystem can expand quickly. Dusk's collaboration with 21X is indeed solid, but with so many players in the privacy track, why can it stand out? Is a 15 million fund really enough? Breaking through the TPS, privacy, and efficiency triangle is too difficult; I remain skeptical. The funding platform is just a platform; the key is whether it can truly be implemented. It's still too early to say anything now. If you ask me, it all depends on whether it can seize the institutional on-chain wave of opportunity; otherwise, it's all in vain.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)