Everyone can share information, but attractiveness is scarce. This is the fundamental difference between AttentionFi and InfoFi.



AttentionFi is not about who posts more. The real competition is about who can make users stop, think, and then choose to interact. In other words, it’s about quality rather than quantity.

The current dilemma is obvious — we are overwhelmed by information. Every day, screens are flooded and bombarded, yet the content that truly leaves an impression is becoming fewer and fewer. This is exactly the problem AttentionFi aims to solve. It’s not just another publishing platform, but a value discovery mechanism. In this ecosystem, those who gain attention are not the ones who post the most, but the creators who can truly resonate and stimulate thought.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
alpha_leakervip
· 01-09 10:14
A direct hit, the logic that quality > quantity should have been popularized long ago. Exactly, right now there's too much spam, and truly thoughtful content is actually scarce. The AttentionFi idea is indeed different; finally, someone has thought of optimizing this system. This is what I want to see—don't just produce those trivial and garbage posts; what I need are things that can trigger reflection. Wait, how does this value discovery mechanism ensure it won't be ruined by spam accounts? Finally, someone has spoken out—what are all these things being posted every day? Quality is the key, I agree with this point; most platforms are going against it. But how many platforms can truly achieve this? It still depends on actual operation. This idea is very clear; an ecosystem that prioritizes quality is indeed healthier.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 01-08 23:49
Sounds good, but it depends on what on-chain data says. What is the token distribution concentration of AttentionFi? Have you checked the holding proportions of large addresses? It feels like another "value discovery" facade, actually just a routine to cut leeks.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTradervip
· 01-08 23:49
You're right, but in reality, it's often the other way around. Very few people actually take the time to think, most still rely on grabbing eyeballs to attract traffic. Quality? It's hard to make money in this circle, brother. This set of theories sounds great, but implementing them is another story. Oh wow, another value discovery mechanism? I'm tired of hearing that... I resonate with the information bombarding, but who really wants to pay for in-depth content? Attractiveness is scarce, but noise is never scarce... So basically, it still depends on whether you can make money, right.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiaovip
· 01-08 23:48
Basically, it's all about content quality being king. I'm tired of being bombarded by junk information. --- Quality over quantity, there's nothing wrong with that, but how many can really do it? --- The logic of AttentionFi sounds good, but I'm worried it will become just another KOL's playground. --- Finally, someone said it out loud. Now everyone is fighting for traffic, and no one is focusing on creating good content. --- This idea hits the pain point, but in practice, who defines what is "truly valuable" content? --- Isn't it just about financializing attention? Sounds impressive, but let's see if it can actually change the current situation. --- I agree. Some people post fifty times a day, but no one reads them. A single high-quality post is better.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)