BCH's performance in recent days has been quite interesting — the long and short positions across the entire network are actually perfectly balanced at 50 to 50. It looks very balanced, but this kind of balance is actually very fragile. The liquidation data from the past 24 hours highlights the issue: longs have lost $648,000, which is twice the amount lost by shorts. What does this mean? The longs are being squeezed.



Technical signals are also warning. The price is firmly held down by EMA7 and EMA25, limiting upward movement; the MACD indicator is below the zero line, lacking upward momentum. The key support level is at $620, which now appears to be precarious.

From a trading perspective, the opportunity points are actually quite clear. A rebound to the $640-$645 range is an ideal short entry point; this rebound is caused by technical resistance and is not strong enough. If the price really breaks below $620, that’s a signal to add to positions, and the trend will be further confirmed. Set the stop loss at $655 and strictly follow risk management. Regarding targets, the first target is at $620; if the price continues to break down, then look at $585.

The most interesting aspect of this market is that the seemingly balanced situation is often broken by the party with the largest losses. Currently, the pressure on the longs is the greatest, so the direction is clear. Trading ultimately is a game of probabilities; seizing high-probability opportunities is the right approach.
BCH0.42%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Feng328vip
· 12h ago
It's a serious market manipulation, all fake data and fake orders.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallengervip
· 18h ago
Interestingly, the data of 648,000 versus 324,000 itself hints at what is called a "self-fulfilling prophecy"—the more you say that the bulls are being squeezed, the more people come to verify this prophecy, and eventually, they get squeezed. Rebound to 640 and then short? I've seen too many stories where these "clear opportunities" ultimately turn into clear losses.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinHuntervip
· 18h ago
Is it the same old story again, 50/50 and you want to scam me? It's more satisfying when the bulls cut their losses, but our bears eating the meat is the real principle. I'm numb, EMA's relentless pressure is really uncomfortable, but I’ve been watching the rebound point at 640-645 closely, just waiting to jump in. If 620 breaks, I’ll go all in directly. Once the trend is confirmed, isn’t there a hundredfold opportunity ahead? Honestly, this wave looks quite clear, but I always feel something's off... Maybe I’m just that squeezed leek.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionistvip
· 18h ago
50-50 seems perfect but is actually a trap. As soon as the liquidation data comes out, the bulls get wiped out. This move definitely has some substance.
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedyvip
· 18h ago
50-50 is ridiculous, this kind of balance breaks with one poke, the longs are already bleeding out, I really need to think about whether I should change my approach.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 18h ago
50-50 looks balanced, but in reality, it's just waiting to see who breaks first. The small losses on the bullish side say everything.
View OriginalReply0
NoodlesOrTokensvip
· 18h ago
The bulls are really having a tough time this wave, with losses doubling directly. It hurts to watch.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)