This case of the prediction market truly刷新了 our understanding of "anything can be bet on."



Here's what happened—predictive platform Kalshi launched a wager: Will the White House Press Secretary's press conference on January 7th last more than 65 minutes? As the probability soared to 98%, traders flooded in. And then? The speaker suddenly hurriedly ended the press conference in the last few seconds, directly disrupting the entire rhythm.

A sudden reversal. Those who bet "No" made 50x returns within seconds. Some say it was just a coincidence, but in prediction markets, such "coincidences" are becoming more and more frequent.

This reveals a core risk of prediction markets: information asymmetry and potential market manipulation. When large sums of money gather in one direction, those who hold the actual information can profit from it. Meanwhile, retail traders who get "cut" can only watch the probability numbers flicker on the screen, unable to see the true intent.

Prediction markets should be tools to discover true probabilities, but now they resemble a battlefield of information. Insider information, timing strategies, even sudden human interventions—these are rewriting the rules of the game.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 16h ago
Wow, this is a typical insider manipulation to trap retail investors. A 98% chance of reversal shows that anything can be manipulated.
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911vip
· 16h ago
That's why I never touch prediction markets — it's purely a game of harvesting profits from newcomers.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroRushCaptainvip
· 16h ago
It's the same story again, with a 98% chance of being artificially cut off, which is truly outrageous. A 50x reverse critical hit, and us retail investors are just the ones getting cut off. The term "information war" sounds so irritating, there's no way to fight back.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 16h ago
actually 98% probability getting liquidated in seconds? that's not even statistically significant market efficiency anymore, that's just information asymmetry with extra steps. the spread alone should've signaled this wasn't an equilibrium state tbh
Reply0
GateUser-26d7f434vip
· 16h ago
It's the same old story. Large investors knowing the outcome can manipulate retail investors, with a 98% chance of a hard reversal. Isn't this just a variant of insider trading?
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 16h ago
I'll be direct: a 98% chance of a 50x counter is not a coincidence, it's an insider job.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)