What makes a certain public chain capable of supporting an ecosystem-level storage infrastructure? The key lies in technological breakthroughs—from underlying coding to architecture design, and privacy protection—forming a complete technical system of "high efficiency + scalability + privacy."



Let's start with the most core component: RedStuff two-dimensional erasure coding. Traditional storage follows a magic rule: to achieve high security, you need to pile on redundancy. But this approach has changed. By splitting data into primary and secondary slices for distributed storage, only 4.5 times redundancy is needed to reach the durability level of traditional 25-fold replication. Data recovery costs drop from O(n) to O(B/n), with efficiency increasing by a factor of 3. Compared to Arweave? Storage costs can be as low as 1/100.

The supporting Epoch dynamic node mechanism is also crucial—each epoch, the system automatically reorganizes storage nodes. Shard transfer doesn’t require waiting for full recovery, which helps absorb node loss and prevents network congestion. This mechanism supports PB-scale storage effortlessly.

At the architecture level, a layered design is employed. Off-chain node clusters handle the heavy lifting of data sharding and backups, while on-chain smart contracts only record data hashes and permission information—saving over 90% of on-chain storage costs. The newly added Seal access control module allows developers to define data access policies directly on-chain, with native support for end-to-end encryption. Privacy scenarios like DeFi and medical data are exactly where this system shines.

Plus, with Quilt small file aggregation technology and Upload Relay upload acceleration, small file storage efficiency is also improved. This is not just about stacking numbers; it’s a rethinking of the entire distributed storage paradigm.
AR-0.23%
SEAL-2.46%
DEFI-2.43%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MemeKingNFTvip
· 01-10 02:25
Listen, 4.5x redundancy eliminates 25x duplication. These numbers are a bit outrageous; we still need to look at real on-chain data to speak the truth. --- Both storage infrastructure and privacy protection—why are these public chains all telling the same story... --- Benchmarking Arweave is meaningless. No matter how big its cost advantage is, it still needs market validation. Don’t just rely on paper data to bluff. --- On-chain smart contracts only record hashes. This architectural idea is indeed clean, but I’m worried that actual operations might be another story. --- Supporting PB-level storage? We need to wait for a few projects to really get off the ground. No matter how loud the hype, it’s all talk. --- The principles behind erasure coding are not new. The key is who can turn cost advantages into market share. Don’t just sit here arguing in the black paper. --- End-to-end encryption should already be standard. Now claiming it as an innovation—kind of ridiculous, right?
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoadvip
· 01-09 10:50
4.5x redundancy eliminates 25x copying; the difference in these numbers is indeed remarkable. But can it truly run in a production environment?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecuevip
· 01-09 10:50
4.5x redundancy eliminates 25x copying. This number is way off, is it real or fake?
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeekvip
· 01-09 10:27
Damn, is this RedStuff erasure coding really true? Can the cost be as low as 1/100 of Arweave's? Why do I feel like I'm about to get ripped off again? I've heard this kind of jargon too many times. Someone should have done this a long time ago; Arweave's approach is too slow. But on the other hand, no matter how advanced the technology is, if no one uses the project, it will still fail... On-chain saves 90%? How? What about previous projects? I haven't heard of these concepts before... Wait, am I experiencing FOMO again? Is this Epoch mechanism reliable? It feels like the same old PPT coin trick. But... what if it's real? Damn. PB-scale storage? If this gets off the ground, it will definitely be used for medical data. Why didn't you say so earlier? Why am I only hearing about this now?
View OriginalReply0
PretendingSeriousvip
· 01-09 10:24
4.5x redundancy eliminates 25x copying. That number sounds a bit outrageous... Is it real?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt