2026-01-10 16:21:58

Dusk Network has been on an unusual path since its establishment in 2018. While the entire public chain ecosystem was focused on TPS, versatility, or hype around meme concepts, it instead bet on the most challenging yet promising area—building blockchain infrastructure for regulated institutional finance.

It sounds a bit crazy, but that's the cleverness of Dusk. Privacy and compliance have always been two major hurdles for integrating blockchains into traditional finance, but it has turned these pain points into core competitive advantages. Through zero-knowledge proofs, homomorphic encryption, and its self-developed Hedger module, Dusk has implemented an interesting mechanism: ordinary traders cannot see others' on-chain details, but regulators with authorized keys can view all information as needed. This approach protects privacy while meeting audit requirements, making it capable of handling strict regulations like EU MiCA and Dutch AFS.

The architecture is even more sophisticated. Dusk adopts a modular design, with consensus, execution, and settlement layers each serving their own functions. What are the benefits? Quickly adjusting strategies to meet different countries' compliance requirements becomes straightforward. The protocol also natively supports KYC/AML interfaces and selective information disclosure, so traditional financial institutions can go on-chain without major system modifications.

The most anticipated development is the launch of DuskTrade. This platform is a joint effort between the Dusk Foundation and the Dutch regulated exchange NPEX, expected to be officially launched in 2026, demonstrating the company's strong execution capability for institutional-grade applications.

DUSK4.01%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingersFOMO

· 3h ago

This approach is indeed brilliant; betting institutions on finance are much smarter than just competing on TPS. Pushing for privacy compliance together? That's pretty ruthless. Wait until 2026 to launch; could it just be another paper project? The zero-knowledge proof system... can it really satisfy regulatory requirements in various countries? That's a bit uncertain. Dusk has some potential this time, but execution will depend on what comes next. That's why some people are all-in on the institutional track. But on the other hand, who can guarantee that the regulatory keys are truly secure? Architectural design is indeed meticulous; modularity is an old but reliable approach. Wanting both privacy and transparency—can it really be a win-win? The endorsement from the Netherlands still carries weight; we need to see the feedback after DuskTrade goes live. They boast loudly, but the key is whether they can really hold up.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 01-10 16:52

Really has some substance; privacy and compliance handled together—this is the right way to go.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 01-10 16:41

Finally, someone is doing something real, not just following the trend and炒概念

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 01-10 16:39

Privacy + compliance is indeed a rare direction, but whether it can truly be implemented depends on execution... As for DuskTrade in 2026, we'll see then.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeePhobia

· 01-10 16:35

Finally, someone is focusing on compliance, otherwise it's really tiring to follow the trend of hype every day. The combination of privacy and compliance is indeed powerful. --- The set of zero-knowledge proofs should have been used long ago. Dusk's approach is quite good, and institutional players find it appealing. --- Wait, can DuskTrade really go live in 2026? The regulatory framework in the Netherlands is still being revised, so it's a bit uncertain. --- Modular architecture is a strong point. Quickly adjusting to different regulatory requirements is indeed a necessity. --- Honestly, compared to those public chains that boast about being fast and powerful every day, Dusk's low-key and pragmatic style is actually more reliable. --- Are privacy and regulation really opposed? Dusk's solution sounds perfect, but will it still encounter various hurdles when implemented? --- Native support for KYC/AML—this detail hits the pain point of traditional finance. They just don't want to bother with system overhauls. --- It's quite interesting. Finally, it's not another TPS arms race.

View OriginalReply0

GasBankrupter

· 01-10 16:34

The combination of compliance + privacy is indeed quite powerful. Privacy protection combined with regulatory friendliness—this approach is brilliant and clearly a differentiated strategy. Really? DuskTrade is launching in 2026? Their execution ability is a bit outrageous. Playing around with zero-knowledge proofs so elaborately—traditional financial institutions might not be able to handle it. Modular design for quick adjustments sounds good, but how reliable is it in practice? Can a partnership with NPEX succeed? That depends on how they proceed next. Is this just another PPT project? There are already many public chains that are regulatory-friendly. How to balance privacy and auditing—this seems to be the biggest challenge.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetNomad