#美国非农就业数据未达市场预期 The underlying reason for the market's tepid response—why are rules so valuable?

After the last incident, the market movement was interesting: US stock index futures experienced only minor fluctuations during low trading volumes, without causing much of a stir. Some say this is because the data itself wasn't explosive enough; others believe the market has become numb to such events. But upon closer reflection, this "calmness" probably reflects a deeper issue.

When anomalies become the norm, trust begins to erode slowly. People gradually stop believing in the sanctity of rules and instead learn to adapt to the reality of rules being broken time and again. Then, everyone starts adjusting their strategies—monitoring key figures' movements to predict the market, using "reading between the lines" to replace confidence in fundamentals. This adaptability seems to demonstrate market resilience, but in reality, it is a gradual erosion of public trust.

The design logic in the cryptocurrency world is completely opposite. Code is law; rules are written on-chain, and any change could mean forks and consensus breakdown—there's no room for "flexible adjustment." This absolute immutability instead forces everyone to respect the rules themselves.

In an era where rules are treated casually and trust is quietly fading, isn't this unwavering adherence to rules particularly precious?

Would love to hear everyone's thoughts.