Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
#以太坊生态发展 Seeing this data, I am beginning to seriously consider the strategic layout for 2026. The combination of stablecoins + RWA + sovereign funds indeed has potential—500 billion in stablecoins, 300 billion in RWA, plus institutional holdings increasing by 5-10 times. This is not just speculative hype but a potential flow of real funds.
The key question is: can these increases truly translate into on-chain activity and sustainable profits? Recently, I’ve been following several traders focused on the RWA sector. Their strategic approach is very clear—early deployment of liquidity infrastructure and rights confirmation protocols within the ecosystem, avoiding chasing high-flying concept tokens. A top trader recently cut losses on a purely speculative RWA project and instead increased holdings in stablecoin protocols. What does this adjustment tell us?
If I really want to follow this trend, my allocation strategy is: conservative allocation to stablecoin infrastructure (40%), moderate allocation to early RWA and ecosystem applications (30%), and the remaining 30% to hold and observe. Those with higher risk appetite can reverse the proportions, but they must set stop-losses—institutional entry is a long-term positive, but short-term volatility will also be more intense.
Only practice will reveal the outcome. Whether 2026 can truly see a 10x growth depends on every current decision to follow trades, which is essentially voting for that result.