#密码资产动态追踪 There's a harsh truth: the upper limit of making money is often stuck at the ceiling of cognition. Especially in the crypto world, this is vividly reflected.

Every time the market heats up, a wave of retail investors rush in. It looks like an opportunity, but most of the time it's just a pre-arranged trap.

Take Filecoin as a cautionary example. The promotional slogans back then sounded fine—"Build a decentralized data storage network that is not controlled by central authorities, where everyone can encrypt and upload information securely." How cool is that? Freedom, privacy, transparency—who wouldn't want that?

But between ideals and reality, there's a bloody line of cutting leeks.

FIL was initially $1, then pumped to $238. Media hype was crazy, mining rigs cost hundreds of thousands each, and people genuinely believed "this is the next Bitcoin." What happened? It peaked right after launch, and within just over a year, it collapsed, leaving investors' hard-earned money worthless.

Why did the ideal of decentralized storage ultimately fail?

Because the costs are damn high. Complex technical requirements, huge hardware investments, and operational costs weigh heavily. The most ironic thing is, the so-called "decentralization" ends up with control still in the hands of a few big institutions—what's so decentralized about that?

Many people aren't lazy; they just have the wrong focus.

The future star projects you're eyeing are basically just harvesting machines disguised with new concepts. Capital has no sentiment, only efficiency. Those beautiful whitepapers and grand visions, if they can't be backed by real application scenarios and user value, are just paper tigers.

Want to avoid pitfalls? Don't rely on finding the next Bitcoin shortcut. Any story that looks great but lacks practical implementation and real demand is ultimately just a pretty shell.

Recognizing this is worth more than chasing after hot trends.