The AI sector's market trend this week isn't finished yet. Today's decline is a buying opportunity, and tomorrow's whether it continues to fluctuate or not is also a buying point. To put it simply, in the current upward cycle we're in, the main wave of the rally hasn't fully played out.



Here's a trading logic worth remembering: as long as the structure of the main wave isn't complete, no matter how many shakeouts occur—whether they last one or two days, three to five days, or even longer—they will ultimately continue to push higher. The length of the shakeout isn't important; what's important is that the structure of the main wave is still being built.

The AI application track is in this state. The non-ferrous metals sector, robotics concepts, and others are similar. The main upward wave of this spring's market hasn't fully unfolded yet, and the structure is incomplete. The story of the market is far from over.

Therefore, moving forward, there is still room for gains, and individual stocks will also have opportunities to form the main upward wave. Instead of worrying about short-term fluctuations, it's better to focus on discovering those stocks whose structural completeness isn't enough yet. The opportunities are right there.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RebaseVictimvip
· 2h ago
Sounds like the old trick of "the main upward wave isn't over yet" again. Is this time real or fake?
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTopvip
· 2h ago
The main upward wave isn't complete yet. I've heard this logic too many times haha
View OriginalReply0
DaoDevelopervip
· 2h ago
nah this structure-incomplete thesis is basically what everyone's pushing rn... but lemme think about the actual game theory here 🤔 if we're really mid-cycle, the wash pattern should follow predictable merkle-proof-like sequences, not just random FUD dumps. what's the actual on-chain evidence tho?
Reply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 2h ago
Damn, it's that same "incomplete structure must lead to a rise" logic again... Bro, large on-chain addresses have been slowly dumping at high levels for a while. Just look at the fund flow data from the past 7 days; retail investor holdings concentration has already broken 90%. Is this what you call a complete main upward wave structure?
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchainvip
· 2h ago
The main upward wave hasn't finished yet. I've believed in this logic several times already, haha.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)