Electric power has enabled the scalable application of energy, and the internet has facilitated the scalable flow of information. So what about AI? We believe it should bring about a scalable upgrade in cognition.



But just scaling up is not enough. The key is to make this expanded cognition verifiable and trustworthy. That’s what we want to achieve.

How to do it? By building a set of technical toolkits:

• ZKML is at the core — using zero-knowledge proofs to provide mathematical guarantees for AI strategy execution, making every step of intelligent decision-making transparent and traceable, and ensuring that the intelligence is truly trustworthy. In this way, AI is no longer a black box, but a system that can be verified, audited, and trusted.

To the builders who believe that code has a soul, let’s work together to make this happen.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ETHmaxi_NoFiltervip
· 2h ago
zkml sounds pretty good, but honestly, it's just about wanting to open up the AI decision-making process for verification. There's nothing wrong with that idea. Trustworthy AI systems are indeed scarce, but saying "code has a soul" is a bit mystical, haha.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 2h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs add an audit chain to AI, and this idea is really not bad. Finally, someone has thought of how to open up the black box.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 2h ago
Black box AI definitely needs regulation, but can ZKML truly solve the trust issue, or is it just another round of hype?
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighborvip
· 2h ago
zkml this approach is indeed very ambitious, but trusting this thing is easier to say than to do --- Being transparent and trustworthy, yet a black box... feels like every new technology has been said before in this theory --- That last line "code has a soul" sounds a bit like chicken soup, but the perspective of cognitive expandability is indeed new --- Wait, zero-knowledge proof combined with AI decision-making, isn't this just another new concept hype? --- Trustworthiness, honestly, still depends on who is doing the verification --- Hmm... from energy, information to cognition, I buy this logical framework --- By the way, can this zkml really make AI completely transparent? I have my doubts --- Interesting, but the real test is in practical implementation
View OriginalReply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/vip
· 2h ago
Black box AI is indeed annoying. The idea behind this ZKML is still interesting, and verifiable decisions sound reliable.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTsvip
· 2h ago
This discussion is quite interesting, but to be honest, trustworthy AI still sounds a bit vague. Can ZKML truly make black boxes transparent? I'm a bit skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)