#策略性加码BTC ⚠️ Wake-up call: Why is your "fundamental coin" actually underperforming a simple concept?

The satire in the crypto world is unfolding:
People with an IQ of 100 are calculating APY, pondering hundreds of billions in FDV, only to end up as the liquidity source for big players. And those who give up on complex analysis? They often laugh last.

The root cause is quite painful—when all projects' tech stacks start to resemble each other, and roadmaps are everywhere but execution is far off, there are really only two scarce things: attention and cultural consensus.

What does the victory of Meme coins tell us?
They lack the pressure of unlocking billions of dollars held by institutions (because VC firms simply don't care), and they don't have overly complex whitepapers that suffocate. Instead, they are rough, straightforward, and full of community warmth. When technology becomes highly homogenized, culture becomes the moat. This isn't irrational; it's the market actively redefining "value" through action.

Your self-rescue manual:
**Tip 1: Beware of high FDV traps** — No matter how beautiful the numbers look, they can't save liquidity from drying up. When institutions unlock, retail investors are often the ones to take the hit.
**Tip 2: Seek asymmetric returns** — Instead of stubbornly sticking to fundamentals, look for projects with genuine community backing, ones that even if they go to zero, are acceptable. Mindset determines life or death.
**Tip 3: Value community over whitepapers** — While they are still talking about "empowering ecosystems," the real strength already lies in the community's consensus.

The long-term logic of BTC and ETH hasn't changed, but the survival rules for mid-cap projects have long been altered. What do you think about this shift? See you in the comments.