Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
CIA Kurd Play Could Trigger Balkanization Of Iran
(MENAFN- Asia Times) CNN has reported that the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is working to arm Kurdish forces to spark an uprising in Iran, which would allegedly be facilitated by neighboring Iraqi Kurdistan.
According to one anonymous CNN source,“the idea would be for Kurdish armed forces to take on the Iranian security forces and pin them down to make it easier for unarmed Iranians in the major cities to turn out without getting massacred again as they were during unrest in January.”
The Iran conflict will expand significantly, however, if Trump plays this Kurdish card. Turkey has a long history of intervening in Iraq and Syria to fight armed Kurdish groups it considers linked to the PKK - which finally laid down its arms last year after decades of guerrilla warfare against the Turkish state - and which Turkey and the US designate as a terrorist organization.
Any significant gains Iranian Kurds might achieve, aided in no small part by US and Israeli air support, could trigger a large-scale Turkish intervention modeled on its earlier campaigns in Iraq and Syria.
Latest stories US sub that sank Iranian frigate rattled China too Iran war: short-term pain, long-term gain for China Iran war make a China attack on Taiwan more likely?
The Syrian Kurds lost US backing after the fall of Bashar Assad and submitted to new Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa’s authority earlier this year, following a Turkish-backed offensive that swiftly dismantled the autonomous region they had carved out since 2011.
This precedent should not inspire optimism among the Iranian Kurds or their Iraqi counterparts ahead of US President Donald Trump’s envisaged Kurdish-led uprising in Iran - one that could effectively constitute an invasion if the Iraqi Kurdish forces become directly involved.
Even so, they might still try their luck, calculating that history will not repeat itself and that the US will not abandon them again. But Trump may be cynically plotting to do precisely that, provoking a Turkish intervention that could catalyze a chain reaction of other interventions.
For instance, Azerbaijan - a close Turkish ally - regards northern Iran, where ethnic Azeris outnumber the entire population of Azerbaijan itself, as“South Azerbaijan” and could move to exploit any opening created by a Turkish anti-Kurdish campaign.
Saudi Arabia, the Gulf’s self-styled leading power, might then lead some of its smaller neighbors into battle against their shared Iranian rival - with or without the UAE, which could attacks unilaterally due to its own bilateral tensions with Tehran.
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan have close ties, and Islamabad might join the conflict as well - either by conducting its own strikes against Iran or launching a limited ground operation against Baloch separatists on similar counterterrorism grounds to those Turkey would cite against the Kurds.
Sign up for one of our free newsletters
The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times’ top stories
AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times’ most-read stories
This potential chain reaction of interventions could begin with Trump playing the Kurdish card, provoking Turkey to be the first to join the war against Iran - even if Ankara and the others act independently of Israel while coordinating only with the US.
If this unfolds, Iran’s balkanization would be a fait accompli, with the only question being its post-war form. Some minority-majority peripheral regions might receive Bosnian-like autonomy, functioning as de facto independent statelets, while others might formally separate as breakaway states.
Other scenarios include annexation by Iran’s neighbors or occupation on peacekeeping or counterterrorism grounds, possibly including no-fly zones. Playing the Kurdish card could therefore prove fatal for Iranian statehood.
A version of this article was first published on Andrew Korybko’s Substack and is republished here with editing for clarity and fluency. Become an Andrew Korybko Newsletter subscriber here.
Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories Or Sign in to an existing accoun
Thank you for registering!
An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.
Share on X (Opens in new window)
Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedI
Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Faceboo
Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsAp
Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddi
Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Emai
Print (Opens in new window) Prin
MENAFN05032026000159011032ID1110822007