Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
2026 Nvidia GTC——More Explosive Content, Colder Stock Price
Why is AI · Huang Renxun’s AI vision cooling the market?
Last night, the China-U.S. talks lasted until after 11 p.m., and when I woke up this morning, Huang’s AI Spring Festival Gala was again making waves.
Jingjing said that the A-shares, especially the light and communication sectors, didn’t drop as much during the war as Huang’s meetings. It was hilarious…
A one-sentence summary of NVIDIA’s GTC 2026 — more explosive content, cooler stock price.
Remember, every year Huang’s GTC is fuel for the capital markets:
Trillions of dollars in demand, 350x inference acceleration, tiered token pricing, Agent ending SaaS… each phrase alone could be a headline. As a result, NVIDIA’s stock rose up to 4.31% intraday but closed up only 1.65%.
Optical modules, CPO chains, copper cables — no movement. In an environment dominated by geopolitical risks and macro uncertainties, funds are holding back.
Huang is still pricing the entire AI ecosystem. But unlike previous years — geopolitical risks are weighing heavily on high-expectation assets.
Huang’s depiction of the AI business world can be summarized in five sentences:
Putting these five points together, Huang’s story is clear: AI is moving from technical demos to full-scale commercialization, and computing power is the common denominator across all stages. The narrative itself isn’t the problem; the market has already largely priced in this story.
Before the conference, the market’s most anticipated theme was the CPO and optical interconnect roadmap, which had high expectations. But Huang gave a very “politically correct” answer: we need more copper cable capacity, more optical chip capacity, more CPO capacity — all of it. This can be seen as a sign that the technology is still in early stages and he doesn’t want to commit fully, or that suppliers and competitors are watching closely, and he must maintain diplomatic language. But for trading, “all of it” means “short-term, no explosive growth.” The Feynman architecture still supports both copper cables and CPO as expansion options, further confirming this. The catalyst for optical modules can only be delayed further.
Three signals worth noting about NVIDIA’s growth:
Before the conference, the biggest consensus among institutions was that short-term demand isn’t worth debating; the real focus is whether AI capital expenditure cycles can extend into 2027-2028. Huang provided a roadmap (Vera Rubin → Rubin Ultra → Feynman), a token economics framework, and a timeline for Groq’s mass production (Q3 shipments), but in terms of firm customer order commitments and infrastructure ROI quantification, the strength remains mostly qualitative. The conference’s overall reaction was “within expectations”: clear technical routes, but the commercial granularity isn’t enough to fully reassure the market.
Huang remains the strongest storyteller in the AI ecosystem, but in the current environment of geopolitical risks and valuation needing hard data, the 2.5-hour perfect speech’s market response shows a few things:
Over the past two years, trading has been accustomed to betting on a single path, so optical communication and CPO had high expectations before his speech. But Huang’s statements actually present a more rational picture: the “long-term vision” (which isn’t really far away, just not fitting the weekly/monthly trading horizon) is now clear — AI demand exists. But where are the constraints? Memory, cooling, power, network, raw material costs, hyperscaler capex… on the supply side.
An investor said something super insightful: “In my view, everywhere in the global supply chain are bottlenecks, but also opportunities.”
Translate this: Huge demand is coming; building a new city requires first renovating the old city. During the renovation, obstacles like old buildings, nail households… might slow down progress. Anything that can solve these bottlenecks is an opportunity.
I believe today’s market pricing is more about short-term geopolitical risks and expectations of “trading positions” — which is understandable, just like the initial craze for AI, where the market values rapid realization over grand narratives.
But from a long-term allocation perspective, the “Beautiful New World” is shifting from narrative to tangible land — the romance is turning into marriage.