Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Adam Back and the Truth About the Quantum Threat in Bitcoin
For years, a fearful rumor has circulated on the internet: quantum computers could “hack” Bitcoin and steal all the coins. But this panic is completely misplaced. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream and one of the leading experts in cryptography in the ecosystem, has decided to put an end to this FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) narrative once and for all.
Adam Back’s credibility on this topic is undeniable. He is not only the inventor of Hashcash, the proof-of-work system that directly inspired Bitcoin, but he also exchanged communications with Satoshi Nakamoto in the early days of the protocol. His opinion on cryptographic security is practically indisputable in the Bitcoin world.
Why Quantum Panic is Fundamentally False
The starting mistake in all these FUD arguments is a basic confusion: people assume that Bitcoin is protected by classic data encryption, like the one your bank uses to store your passwords. But that is incorrect. Adam Back explains it directly and forcefully: “Bitcoin does not use encryption in the sense that FUD propagators intend to attack. Therefore, the entire narrative about a ‘quantum hack’ begins with a fundamental error.”
What’s the crucial difference? Bitcoin relies on cryptographic hash functions and digital signatures, not traditional symmetric or asymmetric encryption. Quantum computers could eventually break certain types of encryption, but the tools that truly protect the Bitcoin network work in a completely different way. It’s like confusing a lock with a wax seal: they are different security systems.
The Real Vulnerable Point is Marginal
The only theoretical risk vector would be in old digital signatures, but even this is purely speculative. Adam Back points out that this real threat horizon is much further away than many believe.
According to his expert assessment:
Bitcoin Has Time and Tools to Adapt
The most important thing is that the network is not defenseless. Bitcoin has several advantages that most FUD propagators overlook: it has enough flexibility to adapt, it has the necessary technology to evolve, and, most critically, it has decades of leeway before any threat becomes real.
Adam Back summarizes this reality with brutal elegance: those who spread quantum fear simply “do not understand the basics.” The Bitcoin network is more secure than many think, and the quantum threat, far from being imminent, belongs to a future so distant that today’s technology will have already completely evolved.