One-Week Trading Journal: Follow My System, Ride the Momentum (Mindset 10)

Like first, then watch, earn 90 million a year![Taoguba]
**
It may be due to the increase in followers and not enough time, but I still want to plan to spend at least three hours a day focusing on interacting with everyone’s comments, helping followers identify and solve problems. So, I will reply in order of the comments, starting from the first post, addressing everyone’s questions; if you have questions, please post them early. Of course, I will do my best to answer all questions.**
**
Additionally, I will prioritize answering questions from the gold fan group. I kindly ask class leader YuanYe888 and committee member XueXI to assist in answering the questions from the regular fans when they have time and energy. Let’s learn together and grow together.**
**
If there happen to be unanswered questions from the previous day, you can post that question again in the new thread.**

This week’s focus is to unfollow Shaoneng, defeat Tianhua, and win against Shengrui De, while gaining experience and wealth together.

On Monday, Shaoneng’s third to fourth progress was below expectations, while Huadian Liaoneng’s fifth to sixth progress has become a certainty. Different types of traders are in different positions, and Shaoneng’s third board T-shaped volume indicates a divergence. It has shifted from a non-volatile single price to divergence, meaning the trading type has evolved from bullish to core leading strategy. Although I do not study sectors, I also know that at the same time, at the same market strength and point, the strongest recognized by market funds is the leader. In prediction, Shaoneng is weaker than Liaoneng by two levels; one is third to fourth, and the other is fifth to sixth. As we mentioned, one more board means nonlinear explosion. Liaoneng has two limit ups, which Shaoneng cannot compare with.

Therefore, from the start of the bidding, Shaoneng was relatively weak. In the end, the third to fourth progress opened with a negative weight in the bidding, indicating that smart investors decisively left the market. I want to see through the entire market with an omniscient perspective, where prediction and result are consistent, making bidding the best exit point.

What is width and tail? This is because during the learning process, I try to find high coefficient stocks to study. For example, although Shaoneng cannot enter the core dragon, it is a high coefficient in the context of breaking boards and consecutive boards. Width refers to the time needed for shorts to increase; during the process of increasing shorts, there is also a width exit, and the price often reflects at a higher price. However, this time the profit effect, I also call it tail market, defined numerically as a 2+1 increase. Therefore, in the tail market, I do not participate because the biggest risk after the tail is the risk from B to C, like Zhewen.

Therefore, although Shaoneng had two limit ups in the tail, the operation suggestion is to choose to give up as much as possible. Of course, if your understanding ability is super strong and you know it’s a tail market, understand it’s a 2+1 increase, know there is no width, and know to act quickly, it is still okay to play, but the smartest approach is to shift funds to the next high coefficient stock.

So, Shaoneng’s 2+1 increase ultimately had no width but rather a large bearish line drop release. I collectively refer to this period as the chaotic time cycle.

Looking back now, this point of entry seems to still be at a low point, as if it has not yet failed. After four days of observation, it hit a limit up. If held with T+0 and the bulls quickly cleared the market, there would also be expectations. Therefore, this varies with each person’s requirements. At least my standards for myself are quite strict because four days, for me, is a relatively long time cycle with uncertainty, coupled with a low volume. The low volume’s C is a region, which is not suitable for my current high-frequency trading, so I unfollowed and used subtraction to eliminate low volume trading.

The fourth-day limit up allows you to make money, but compared to Meiliyun’s immediate two-board replay, Baichuan’s immediate three-board replay, or Hanlan’s immediate four-board replay, regardless of time management or expected value, Chitianhua is just a little brother. Thus, this trade is about experience because the funds in the account are limited; you can only be precise to maximize profit.

If you switch the funds from Tianhua to AoRD, will you regret the limit up after four days? No, you won’t.

I believe that investors who choose ultra-short trading all hope to buy today and make money the same day or buy today and generate profit the next day. Therefore, all ultra-short trading is pursuing this extreme, and I am no exception; hence, my holding time cycle remains between 2-2.5.

AoRD is the same, in the second to third, bulls replay, as long as there is divergence, it is an exit point. This itself does not belong to the core dragon; what you are doing is breaking boards trading, which will not elevate expectations to consecutive board trading. Consecutive board replay increases only count as excess expectations, and the original intention cannot change.

Its limit up on Friday is similarly seen as a tail market, reflecting the width.

The battle of the East is somewhat thrilling because its intraday volatility is too large. During the learning process, my heart couldn’t take it. It changed from the previous 3+2+1 release to extreme pulling. If you understand this, shorts will be cleaned out even more because extremes are super contrary to human nature. A huge amount + extremes means a disaster for unstable bulls; it will force you into a situation of mutual slaughter among bulls. Therefore, if you have a backup plan, you can maintain psychological balance, such as my T+0 strategy response. If you do not exit based on intraday dynamics, I will implement the T+0 strategy to make profits from price volatility. At this time, you must remember the two main sources of ultra-short profit: one is directional profit, and the other is price volatility profit.

The biggest drawback of my trading model is that it is completely a closed trading style, self-immersive, often forgetting the current index and the outside world. For example, when retail funds have surrendered, I am still trading in a self-indulgent manner.

Personal opinion only for reference.

Today’s discussion on trading strategies will stop here for now. It is not easy to preach, and I hope fate allows us to cherish each other.
**
30 years of short-term practical experience, 25 years of low buying, and the last 5 years began to shift to board trading, including first boards, consecutive boards, and leading stocks, with all trading strategies derived from my original “Emotional Quantitative ACB Trading System.”**
**
On the Taoguba platform, everyone can freely communicate, learn from each other, and share insights. I will also honestly share my operational thoughts, market views, and personal positions.**
**
However, I must remind everyone: the platform strictly prohibits stock recommendations and trading guidance. All content I share is merely personal records and thought exchanges, and does not constitute any investment advice.**
Followers can reference and discuss, but must make independent judgments, bear their own profits and losses, and invest rationally, without following blindly and adhering to their own trading principles.
**
Next, let’s look at the mental strategies, which I estimate will be challenging for everyone to interpret.**

Emotional ACB System (Ten)
Creator: Wild Man Brother Release Date: 2023-12-10
This is an extremely emotional market. When making money, it seems the whole world will be yours, and you cannot remain calm. Therefore, a truly valuable knowledge system must be your reflection after suffering great losses, after sleepless nights!

In my entire trading system, the core is a long-term pressure measurement value multi-frequency trading system and a mixed single-frequency massive leading strategy. There is no absolute discontinuity between the two; that is to say, when trading these two models, they are different techniques, but the premise is to accurately distinguish their attribute issues.

Just as I mention the defensive and offensive aspects of the extreme pull strategy, I found that defense should come first. When two points are at two extremes, they must return. When I saw Weishi Electronics experiencing three limit downs after extreme pulling, Tianwei Vision’s single price limit down, and Yinbaoshan’s new heaven and earth board + next day’s single price limit down, I suddenly realized that the attack of Wenyike Technology was not that important anymore.

Thus, today I want to clarify the distinction between the long-term emotional value containing pressure measurement value and the short-term emotional value of single-frequency massive leading strategies.

Therefore, today’s article is about the relationship and usage between static density coefficient price and the strength conversion of single-frequency massive leading strategies.
What is static density coefficient price?
It refers to the current state of stock price operation under low volume conditions. Here is a key point: low volume. The high and low of static density coefficient price is determined by pressure measurement value and smooth high-frequency coefficient. As shown in the figure:

Note: The static density coefficient price in the above figure indicates that under the condition of having pressure measurement value, the center of the static density price coefficient gradually rises over time because the pressure measurement value refers to the investors or speculators in that stock who will not panic due to the current large market drop. This sentence translates into quantification as: over time, if trading continues without fear of selling, it indicates active buying, meaning more bullish participants are increasing. The counter-evidence is that the static density coefficient price will rise.

What is the strong-to-weak and weak-to-strong conversion of the single-frequency leading strategy?
This refers to the stock price instantly evolving from the original static density coefficient price to a high-level pattern. Two indicators are very important here: massive volume and strength conversion.

When I mention these two indicators, students should understand the principle of premium in trading, which is the two main sources of profit: the cycle between static density coefficient price in long-term emotional value under low volume and massive volume, and the strong-to-weak (core definition of strong-to-weak: divergence release caused by excessive consistency) in short-term emotional value produced by single-frequency massive leading strategies, followed by weak-to-strong premium. The definition of strong-to-weak is crucial; from the performance perspective, the release of strong-to-weak is very similar to the decline pattern after a significant rise. Strong-to-weak is a buying point, premium is weak-to-strong, and the peak represents weak does not convert to strong. As shown in the figure:

Thus, long-term emotional value is the principle of trend profit, whereas short-term emotional value is the principle of emotional consensus profit. Here, I want to emphasize that there is no obvious boundary between long-term and short-term; hence their coefficients can be high or low. When choosing, try to trade with high coefficients, as their depreciation resistance will be relatively strong.
Currently, in the market, both multi-frequency trend profit and single-frequency leading profit trading modes are very popular. However, the single-frequency leading profit mode is more challenging because it has a higher turnover frequency. Once you enter a cycle of errors, it can lead to a complete loss of your principal within months. Therefore, from a learning perspective, you should first learn multi-frequency before single-frequency.
Multi-frequency is based on time, using daily smooth high-frequency as the profit point.
Single-frequency aims for height, completing rapid turnover in a short span; prolonging time can backfire. Thus, the former requires time, while the latter requires speed; these are two points that need to be clearly distinguished.
Next time, we will explain how to apply this in practical cases in detail.

Next, we enter today’s review session.

On Friday, there were 10 consecutive board stocks, none with a dragon shape, only two with better patterns, to be kept in the home fish pond, and eaten when mature.

In fact, the focus is on DongFXN; let’s see if there are good expectations today. Theoretically, massive volume + extremes will have an over-expected performance.

Personal opinion only for reference.
**
Thank you all for your recognition; in this world, only sincerity cannot be betrayed! My wish is to have many students.**

I found that there are many new loyal fans.