Why is economics always full of controversy

robot
Abstract generation in progress

In November 2008, with the financial crisis not yet over, when Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom visited the London School of Economics and Political Science, in front of a room full of economics professors, she asked a question that left everyone speechless: “Why didn’t anyone foresee the arrival of this crisis?” No one was able to give a satisfactory answer.

In fact, economics is a field that has almost no consensus. The same question, answered by different economists, often leads to completely opposite conclusions. Even within the same person, views can change over time—people at the very top of the academic pyramid are not exempt from this. Nobel Prize–winning economist and MIT professor Paul Samuelson, in the early editions of his influential textbook Economics, repeatedly predicted that the Soviet economy would surpass that of the United States. Yet, as history is well known to have shown, the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991.

We recommend entering the Caixin database so you can consult macroeconomics, stocks and bonds, company profiles, and other finance and business data at any time—everything is under your control.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin