Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Profit plummeted 85%, earning only 19.1 million, yet they splurged 36 million on dividends! Decoding the rebirth gamble and life-and-death breakout behind China Minmetals Development's 2025 annual report
On March 30, 2026, Minmetals Development (600058.SH) turned in its 2025 performance report. This annual report is like a heavy blow that shatters the market’s fantasy about traditional trading merchants: revenue was RMB 52.82B, down 21.44% year over year; net profit attributable to shareholders was only RMB 19.1038 million, plunging 84.8% year over year. However, what’s surprising is that against the backdrop of a sharp drop in earnings, the company still unveiled a dividend proposal of RMB 0.336 per 10 shares, distributing 188.53% of net profit as dividends, with a total cash payout of RMB 36.0162 million.
This looks like a “blowout” performance, but if we combine it with the major asset restructuring plan disclosed in the annual report—proposing to dispose of trading assets and inject equity stakes in Minmetals Mining and Luzhong Mining—we can understand the intent behind it: this is not just a “major reset” of performance, but a “survival-by-breaking-the-arm” “rebirth gamble.”
01 Performance “deep squat”: clearing and deleveraging of the old era
For Minmetals Development, 2025 was the year the old model fully failed.
From the financial data, the company not only saw revenue fall by about two tenths, but its net profit after deducting non-recurring items turned into a loss of RMB 146 million. The reasons behind this are the reality of being squeezed from both ends:
From a quarterly perspective, although revenue grew quarter-on-quarter in the fourth quarter, losses continued. This indicates that the traditional “trading + logistics” model has already hit its ceiling, and the era of simply chasing profits through scale has ended.
Also worth noting is that although Minmetals Development’s book profits were slim, its operating cash flow did not dry up. The annual report shows that the net cash flow generated from operating activities was RMB 1.22B. This indicates that while the trading business may not be profitable, cash flow turnover remains healthy—demonstrating the “ability to generate cash/earnings power” to support the restructuring transition period.
02 The “mystery” of the dividend: reassurance and confidence behind the drawdown
With net profit attributable to shareholders left at only RMB 19 million, Minmetals Development still insisted on paying dividends of RMB 36.01 million. This “drawdown-style” dividend conveys two signals:
03 The underlying meaning of the restructuring: a transformation from a “mover/porter” to a “resource king”
If the company’s 2025 performance was the end of the “old Minmetals,” then the major asset restructuring highlighted in the annual report marks the beginning of “new Minmetals.”
According to the annual report’s disclosure of major matters, Minmetals Development is planning to purchase the equity stakes in Minmetals Mining Holdings Co., Ltd. and Luzhong Mining Co., Ltd. held by the controlling shareholder, Minmetals Co., through asset swaps, issuing shares, and paying cash.
This one in, one out signifies a fundamental reversal in the business model:
04 Future outlook: deeper business purification, accelerating “digitalization + green transformation”
In addition to the asset restructuring, the annual report also reveals another path for the company’s business transformation—not that all old businesses are being discarded, but that they are being deeply “purified.”
In addition, facing a harsh market environment, Minmetals Development is accelerating its strategic transition toward “digitalization + green transformation,” cultivating new growth drivers.
Conclusion: a value reassessment worth waiting for
Minmetals Development’s 2025 annual report is a declaration of determination to “cut the arm to survive.” The meager profit of RMB 19.1 million and the high dividend payout ratio of 188.53% are the final curtain call before the old era ends. Meanwhile, the ongoing asset restructuring is the company’s rejection of its past rough-and-ready trading model.
For investors, they should no longer fixate on the bleak 2025 performance, but instead focus on the asset restructuring coming next. Once Minmetals Mining and Luzhong Mining are successfully injected, Minmetals Development will undergo a complete transformation. This is a gamble that retreats to advance—betting on the rigid upstream resource demand driven by China’s manufacturing upgrade, and betting on a value reassessment from “trading price spreads” to “resource dividends.”
In 2026, with the restructuring landing and new business efforts, whether Minmetals Development can truly turn losses into profits is something we should watch closely.
Source: Wanlian Network
-End-
To help state-owned enterprise trading companies complete revenue and expand profits more compliantly and with lower risk, on April 9–10, 2026, Wanlian Network plans to hold the 8th session of the “Supply Chain Business Full-Process, Full-Staff Risk Control Operating Rules Implementation Workshop” in Wuhan. This series of courses has already launched seven sessions, cumulatively attracting more than 700 executives in group registrations from nearly 300 large state-owned enterprise groups, building a strong reputation.
In the 8th session, the course content has undergone a major upgrade. We deeply integrate the compliance red lines and risk points from the “Order No. 46” that everyone is especially concerned about. Not only do we provide in-depth explanations of full-process risk control rules and supporting tool templates, but we also specially set up a training and rehearsal segment for financing-related trading case simulations. Two senior mentors from Wanlian Network—Zhang Teacher, Chief Risk Management Expert in practice, and Zhang Teacher, Chief Legal Risk Control Expert for supply chain business—will break down “Order No. 46” and make it crystal clear. Whether you want to understand the boundaries of the new rules or to establish a full set of supply chain business risk control operating rules covering the whole process “pre-, during-, and post-” with full participation, this course can help you take fewer detours and step into fewer pitfalls.
On the first day of the course, we will invite Zhang Teacher, the Chief Risk Control Officer from a former Global Fortune 500 group, with more than 20 years of hands-on risk control experience in large supply chain enterprises and a cumulative value of over RMB 10 billion for helping companies avoid and reduce losses from various investment and operational, and credit risk. From the perspective of external counterparty credit risk control, he will break down the key hands-on points of a company’s end-to-end business credit risk management:
Even more notably, Zhang Teacher will share, without reservation, a series of practical risk control template tools, including a “four-stream integration” rapid verification checklist, an SOP for dynamic monitoring of title to goods rights, on-site due diligence operation guidelines, a minimalist customer profile scoring sheet for supply chain trade customers, customer profile templates for manufacturing/agri-products industries, credit rating table templates, templates for counterparty credit rating and tiered credit granting strategies, an approval authority matrix template, and an SOP for hands-on management of title to goods rights for large-scale supply chain logistics, etc. He will combine years of work methods and experience to explain in detail how to proactively defuse risks through detail management.
On the second day of the course, we invited Zhang Teacher, a partner at Beijing Deheheng (Shenzhen) Law Firm, who has extensive litigation experience, nearly 20 years of practical supply chain risk control experience, and has provided legal and compliance services to multiple state-owned enterprises. From the perspective of internal business operations risk control, he will provide a detailed sharing of the formulation of negative lists for supply chain business, the design of contracts/documents/orders, and the operational and supervisory management stages during the process, and will lead a simulation rehearsal case for financing-related trading.
Zhang Teacher will combine multiple risk cases he personally handled as an agent to organize trainees for simulation rehearsals, and deeply dissect hidden traps in contracts signing before the process and potential risks in operations during the process: from the design of subject-matter clauses in contract signing, the design of emergency trigger clauses, and the design of documents, to operational omissions in goods receiving and dispatching and commercial follow-up skills; from counterparty logistics transport service provider/warehouse provider admission evaluation and dynamic assessment design, to execution deviations in inventory checks and inspection rounds, bid-price monitoring details, and risk review methods (customer follow-up/ business risks/ documents). Each stage is equipped with specific operational methods to ensure trainees can understand, learn, and apply them.
☎️ Course registration consultation: Contact person: Teacher Li Phone: 19168536275
For unlimited information and precise analysis, it’s all on the Sina Finance APP