Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
In a VPN case involving more than 3 million yuan, the parties were arrested on charges of "providing tools for intrusion and illegal control of computer information systems."
The lawyer argued that VPNs are essentially encrypted transmission tools, designed to bypass interception, and do not have malicious functions such as intrusion or control of computer information systems. Therefore, even if there is illegality, it does not necessarily constitute a crime.
In the end, the prosecution accepted the relevant opinions, the public security authorities withdrew the case, and the case was dismissed without conviction.
This case also illustrates that the key to technical cases lies in first explaining the principles clearly and then accurately distinguishing between "illegality" and "crime."
Transferred from [Lawyer Chen Peiwen's work]