Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, there's been talk again about sharding and parallel processing, and the chat groups are lively as if it's the New Year. But my old self, who has seen it all, has a simple mindset: no matter how fast it gets, I first need to think clearly about where to put my assets and whether I can get them out. To put it plainly, with more bridges, cross-chain options, and various new wallet permissions, the costs of failed transactions and the tuition fees for "multi-signature keys forgotten by whom" are also rising.
I thought that after sharding, the chain would be more "fair," but the MEV (Miner Extractable Value) is still the same. Miners/validators are making even more profit, while retail investors are complaining that the transaction ordering is like a lottery... Anyway, I don't think there's a rush to adopt the new narrative now. First, I want to have my exit plan in mind: if I really need to run, which bridge to use, which main chain to land on, whether to multi-sign, and how much fee to reserve. No rush is fine; I just don't want to end up with a pile of dust and a simple "pay attention next time."