Lately, the more I watch governance voting, the more I feel uneasy, claiming to be "community co-governance," but in the end, a bunch of people entrust their votes to a few big accounts, and it ends up like a shareholders' meeting... I'm not pretending to understand everything, but I just feel like who the token really governs: serious proposers often have no say, while those who hold the delegation relationships set the tone with a single word. What's more awkward is that I used to leverage based on "positive voting expectations," but after quitting, I realize this emotion was just fed to us.



The NFT royalty disputes are also quite similar, also claiming to be "for creators / for liquidity," but in the end, who can influence the rules? It's still those platforms and big players who can bring volume and set market standards. Anyway, I now hold small spot positions and options hedges, trying not to get caught up in the "governance narrative" and lose my head... That's all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin